Author
Listed:
- Yadav, Manish
- Patil, Gopal R.
- Mepparambath, Rakhi Manohar
Abstract
Inequity in public transport system access affects the mobility and overall social and economic development of vulnerable groups, who rely on public transport for accessing jobs, healthcare, and education. Very few studies discuss the interplay between accessing the transit system and social vulnerability, especially in developing cities. This study presents a comprehensive framework for measuring social and spatial inequity in transit accessibility by integrating Public Transport Accessibility Levels (PTAL), transit gap, and social vulnerability. PTAL measures a transit supply component, while the potential transit-dependent population is the demand. The difference between transit demand and transit supply is the transit gap. The Gini index is used to quantify the degree of accessibility, while bivariate analysis is used to explore spatial patterns and critical areas where transit accessibility is most problematic. Additionally, a Social Vulnerability Index is designed based on socioeconomic indicators, which helps to address public transit needs beyond slum and non-slum classifications. PTAL analysis found that 31.8% of Mumbai’s population falls below the Good transit accessibility level. 52.2% of the population lives in high transit gap areas, and 13.6% live in transit deserts. It is observed that the accessibility to transit is not equitable for different population classes. For example, 32.5% of the highly vulnerable population is in low accessibility-high gap regions. Based on PTAL, transit gap, and social vulnerability, the study suggests targeted policy measures for reducing socio-spatial inequities in transit system accessibility. These findings can aid policymakers in improving transit accessibility and equity for vulnerable populations.
Suggested Citation
Yadav, Manish & Patil, Gopal R. & Mepparambath, Rakhi Manohar, 2026.
"Socio-spatial equity in public transit system accessibility for slum and non-slum population in a developing mega city,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003714
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104738
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.