IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v203y2026ics0965856425003659.html

Encouraging voluntary driving practice among learner drivers aged 21–30 in Victoria: a randomised controlled trial of behavioural interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Plant, Bernice
  • Tull, Fraser
  • Bartels, Juliet
  • Mestroni, Kim
  • Faulkner, Nick

Abstract

This online randomised controlled trial explored the effects of two novel behavioural interventions and an active control condition on learner drivers’ intentions to complete a minimum of 80 h of voluntary supervised driving practice (practice hours) before taking their driver licence test. The final sample of 658 learner drivers aged 21–30 years from Victoria (Australia) was randomly assigned to one of three online intervention conditions: a persuasive message (n = 247), a planning tool (n = 204), or a handbook (an active control condition) (n = 207). The persuasive message aimed to challenge the misconception that older learner drivers do not require extensive driving practice, while the planning tool supported learners in developing personalised plans for practice. The handbook was an existing educational resource, providing general information for learner drivers, including the benefits of practice hours. Primary outcome variables, measured before and after intervention exposure, included overall likelihood and overall attitude towards completing at least 80 h of supervised driving practice, as well as the total number of practice hours participants planned to complete and would be willing to undertake before sitting their driver licence test. Mixed ANOVAs indicated that the persuasive message significantly increased learners’ overall likelihood and overall attitude, as well as their planned and willing hours. In contrast, the planning tool did not demonstrate significant improvements in the primary outcomes and was associated with higher rates of dropout from the study, suggesting limited acceptability. The handbook (control) reduced overall attitude towards completing 80 practice hours. Additional analyses revealed differences in perceived impact and information-seeking behaviour across intervention conditions, with the effects of the persuasive message and the planning tool (compared to the handbook) being mediated by self-efficacy beliefs rather than beliefs about consequences. The findings provide preliminary support for a persuasive message as a cost-effective and feasible intervention to promote voluntary supervised driving practice among learner drivers. Implementing such messages could enhance road safety by encouraging learners to accumulate adequate driving practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Plant, Bernice & Tull, Fraser & Bartels, Juliet & Mestroni, Kim & Faulkner, Nick, 2026. "Encouraging voluntary driving practice among learner drivers aged 21–30 in Victoria: a randomised controlled trial of behavioural interventions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003659
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425003659
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104732?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.