Author
Listed:
- Ma, Mengke
- Bian, Zilin
- Gao, Jingqin
- Yang, Hai
- Chow, Joseph Y.J.
- Ozbay, Kaan
Abstract
Transportation equity research has traditionally emphasized service accessibility and destination reachability while often overlooking the critical aspects of service quality, such as infrequent schedules or overcrowded vehicles. This oversight can lead to a skewed understanding of equity, as high accessibility does not guarantee high-quality service. Addressing this gap, we propose a transportation equity index called the multi-dimensional, high-granularity (MDHG) index. Such an index considers service accessibility and quality alongside population demographics. This approach ensures that areas with high accessibility but low service quality are recognized as inequitable. The MDHG Index addresses service performance by incorporating performance data with temporal variations based on actual trip data, thus offering a more nuanced view of transportation equity that reflects the real-world experiences of service users. Furthermore, to effectively identify and address the needs at the user level, we need to use a highly granular population dataset. Due to the low granularity of census and other open-source datasets, we opted to use a highly granular synthetic dataset. To test out the MDHG Index, we coupled a highly granular synthetic population dataset with data from New York City’s Citi Bike expansion to use as a case study to assess changes in accessibility and service quality before and after the expansion. The MDHG approach effectively identified areas that improved post-expansion and highlighted those requiring further enhancement, thus showing the effectiveness of the index in targeted improvements for transportation equity.
Suggested Citation
Ma, Mengke & Bian, Zilin & Gao, Jingqin & Yang, Hai & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ozbay, Kaan, 2026.
"A multi-dimension and high-granularity equity measurement for transportation services through accessibility and reliability,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003623
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104729
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.