IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v201y2025ics0965856425003027.html

Children’s preferences in urban street design: an image-based best-worst scaling experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Stark, Juliane
  • Punz, Tanja
  • Werner, Lisa
  • Wedenig, Rahel
  • Su, Shun
  • Hössinger, Reinhard

Abstract

Children’s active mobility has been steadily declining, raising concerns about how they perceive their traffic environments while walking and cycling. This study explores adolescents’ preferences for urban street design that encourages active mobility, employing an innovative image-based best-worst scaling (BWS) method with multi-profiles. The research involved children aged 12–14 from three schools in Austria and consisted of a preliminary study to define relevant attributes, a BWS experiment, and ex-post interviews with participants. The results reveal that children are highly aware of their surroundings and place significant importance on the design of street spaces. Key factors influencing their sense of safety and well-being as pedestrians included less litter, more greenery, fewer pedestrians, and wider sidewalks. For cyclists, a greater distance from car lanes, lower levels of car traffic, and increased greenery were crucial in enhancing their perceptions of well-being and safety. Additionally, interaction effects between the attributes were identified, offering deeper insights into their preferences. The findings underscore the need for tailored urban design elements that align with adolescents’ needs and preferences, contributing to the development of healthier, safer, and more engaging urban spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Stark, Juliane & Punz, Tanja & Werner, Lisa & Wedenig, Rahel & Su, Shun & Hössinger, Reinhard, 2025. "Children’s preferences in urban street design: an image-based best-worst scaling experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425003027
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425003027
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104674?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorji Wangzom & Marcus White & Jeni Paay, 2023. "Perceived Safety Influencing Active Travel to School—A Built Environment Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Christine Michaels-Igbokwe & Gillian R. Currie & Bryanne L. Kennedy & Karen V. MacDonald & Deborah A. Marshall, 2021. "Methods for Conducting Stated Preference Research with Children and Adolescents in Health: A Scoping Review of the Application of Discrete Choice Experiments," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(6), pages 741-758, November.
    3. Shr, Yau-Huo (Jimmy) & Ready, Richard & Orland, Brian & Echols, Stuart, 2019. "How Do Visual Representations Influence Survey Responses? Evidence from a Choice Experiment on Landscape Attributes of Green Infrastructure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 375-386.
    4. Nasar, Jack L. & Holloman, Christopher & Abdulkarim, Dina, 2015. "Street characteristics to encourage children to walk," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 62-70.
    5. Renate Eder & Arne Arnberger, 2016. "How heterogeneous are adolescents’ preferences for natural and semi-natural riverscapes as recreational settings?," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 555-568, July.
    6. Sener, Ipek N. & Lee, Richard J. & Sidharthan, Raghu, 2019. "An examination of children’s school travel: A focus on active travel and parental effects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 24-34.
    7. Nafsika Michail & Ayse Ozbil & Rosie Parnell & Stephanie Wilkie, 2021. "Children’s Experiences of Their Journey to School: Integrating Behaviour Change Frameworks to Inform the Role of the Built Environment in Active School Travel Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, May.
    8. DeLong, Karen L. & Syrengelas, Konstantinos G. & Grebitus, Carola & Nayga, Rodolfo M., 2021. "Visual versus Text Attribute Representation in Choice Experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. Shabnam Abdollahi & Owen Waygood & Zahra Tavakoli & Marie-Soleil Cloutier & Irène Abi-Zeid, 2024. "Understanding the Factors Affecting Traffic Danger for Children: Insights From Focus Group Discussions," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9.
    10. Genius Murwirapachena & Johane Dikgang, 2022. "The effects of presentation formats in choice experiments," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 24(3), pages 421-445, July.
    11. repec:plo:pone00:0143302 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Eppink, Florian V. & Hanley, Nick & Tucker, Steven, 2019. "How Best to Present Complex Ecosystem Information in Stated Preference Studies?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 20-25.
    13. Weber, Susanne Theresia & Wernitz, Frank, 2021. "Die Inhaltsanalyse nach Mayring als Auswertungsmethode für wissenschaftliche Interviews," IU Discussion Papers - Business & Management 6/2021, IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    14. Potoglou, Dimitris & Burge, Peter & Flynn, Terry & Netten, Ann & Malley, Juliette & Forder, Julien & Brazier, John E., 2011. "Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: An empirical comparison using social care data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(10), pages 1717-1727, May.
    15. Hess, Stephane & Palma, David, 2019. "Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Jiawei Li & Jun Zhang, 2024. "A Study on the Impact of Street Environment on Elderly Leisure Path Preferences Based on the Stated Preference Method (SP Method)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Arellana, J. & Garzón, L. & Estrada, J. & Cantillo, V., 2020. "On the use of virtual immersive reality for discrete choice experiments to modelling pedestrian behaviour," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    18. Nicolas Krucien & Jonathan Sicsic & Mandy Ryan, 2019. "For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best–worst discrete choice experiments in health," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 572-586, April.
    19. Nikitas, Alexandros & Wang, Judith Y.T. & Knamiller, Cathy, 2019. "Exploring parental perceptions about school travel and walking school buses: A thematic analysis approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 468-487.
    20. T.N. Flynn & A.A.J. Marley, 2014. "Best-worst scaling: theory and methods," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 8, pages 178-201, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kei Kabaya & Kayo Tajima & Daisuke Ichinose & Michiko Asano, 2025. "Do different visual presentation formats encourage different choice behaviors? discrete choice experiment on urban park landscapes," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 27(1), pages 23-41, January.
    2. Soekhai, V. & Donkers, B. & Levitan, B. & de Bekker-Grob, E.W., 2021. "Case 2 best-worst scaling: For good or for bad but not for both," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    3. Li, Zhuo & Li, QiuShan & Mikiko, Ishikawa & Zhao, Bo, 2026. "Residents’ preference for sustainable habitats through choice experiments using 3D visualisations: Evidence from Rural Western Sichuan, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Perolia, Daniel R. & Collart, Alba J. & Yehouenou, Lauriane, 2016. "Consumer Preferences for Delacata Catfish: A Choice Experiment with Tasting," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 47(3), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Ivan Sever & Miroslav Verbič & Eva Klaric Sever, 2020. "Estimating Attribute-Specific Willingness-to-Pay Values from a Health Care Contingent Valuation Study: A Best–Worst Choice Approach," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 97-107, February.
    6. Matthews, Yvonne, 2023. "A hybrid and hierarchical stated preference study of freshwater restoration in Aotearoa New Zealand," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    7. Ho Yeung Lam & Sisitha Jayasinghe & Kiran D. K. Ahuja & Andrew P. Hills, 2023. "Active School Commuting in School Children: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Future Research Implications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(20), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Pilar Uldemolins & M. Teresa Maza & Tiziana de-Magistris, 2025. "Landscape presentation formats influence consumer’s preferences for origin and botanical variety of Spanish honey," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Aizaki, Hideo & Fogarty, James, 2019. "An R package and tutorial for case 2 best–worst scaling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Yangui, Ahmed & Akaichi, Faical & Costa-Font, Montserrat & Gil, Jose Maria, . "Comparing results of ranking conjoint analyses, best–worst scaling and discrete choice experiments in a nonhypothetical context," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(2).
    11. Rotaris, Lucia & Del Missier, Fabio & Scorrano, Mariangela, 2023. "Comparing children and parental preferences for active commuting to school. A focus on Italian middle-school students," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    12. Osman, Ahmed M.Y. & Wu, Jing & He, Xiaoning & Chen, Gang, 2021. "Eliciting SF-6Dv2 health state utilities using an anchored best-worst scaling technique," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    13. Broberg, Thomas & Daniel, Aemiro Melkamu & Persson, Lars, 2021. "Household preferences for load restrictions: Is there an effect of pro-environmental framing?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    14. Yang, J. & Chen, F., 2021. "How are social-psychological factors related to consumer preferences for plug-in electric vehicles? Case studies from two cities in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    15. Petrolia, Daniel R., 2016. "Risk preferences, risk perceptions, and risky food," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 37-48.
    16. Agyeman, Stephen & Cheng, Lin, 2020. "Analysis of barriers to perceived service quality in Ghana: Students’ perspectives on bus mobility attributes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 63-85.
    17. Buliung, Ron & Bilas, Patrick & Ross, Timothy & Marmureanu, Cosmin & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2021. "More than just a bus trip: School busing, disability and access to education in Toronto, Canada," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 496-505.
    18. de Kruiff, Tim & Legarth, Jonas Vester & Lundhede, Thomas & Pless, Carl-Emil & Skov-Petersen, Hans & Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl, 2025. "Seasonality of the recreational value of forests in Denmark," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    19. Matas-Monroy, Javier Hernán & Martín, Juan Carlos & Román, Concepción, 2025. "An importance-performance analysis of public transport to the university campus based on best-worst scaling," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Boxebeld, Sander, 2024. "Ordering effects in discrete choice experiments: A systematic literature review across domains," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425003027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.