IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v201y2025ics0965856425002976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning passafeguard in conflict zones and assessment of public transport stop accessibility to shelters

Author

Listed:
  • Galkin, Andrii
  • Samchuk, Ganna
  • Lyfenko, Serhii
  • Botsman, Anastasiia
  • Braterska, Nataliia
  • Hriekova, Olesia
  • Drobotova, Yevheniia
  • Tolmachov, Illya

Abstract

This study investigates the adaptation of urban mobility in Kharkiv, Ukraine, focusing on assessing passenger safety near public transport stops and accessibility to protective shelters. In response to the ongoing threat from missiles, drones, and artillery, we developed a unique methodology to evaluate the “passafeguard” level at various transit stops across the city. Using PTV VISUM software, we conducted spatial–temporal analyses that consider different types of threats, directly impacting the time available for passengers to reach safety. Isochrones were constructed for three time intervals (2,5, and 15 min) based on threat types (e.g., Ballistic, S‑300; Cruise missile; Strike Drones) to identify shelter accessibility. Our system analysis includes a variety of shelter types: metro stations, basements, and specially designed concrete shelters at transit stops. We assessed passenger safety in distinct Transport Analysis Zones (TAZs) across different scenarios: pre-invasion, invasion, power available, and blackout (temporary routes), which affect the availability of electric transport options. Key metrics calculated include density by shelter types in proximity to the stops, coverage area of shelters, and stops lacking shelter proximity. This study highlights current shortcomings in Kharkiv’s public transport stops accessibility to shelters and provides a method to assess it across other cities facing similar challenges. It leads to specific recommendations for optimising shelter locations to improve accessibility. The quadrant-based classification system enables diagnosis of mismatched infrastructure zones (e.g., high-transit but low-shelter coverage), informing targeted interventions. By conceptualising transit stops as critical nodes in civil protection planning, the passafeguard concept offers a transferable methodology for enhancing urban resilience. Research provides broader discourse on transportation infrastructure safety, emergency response in urban conflict environments, urban mobility adaptive protection strategies and passenger safety, offering data-driven insights and actionable recommendations for policy-makers and urban planners globally.

Suggested Citation

  • Galkin, Andrii & Samchuk, Ganna & Lyfenko, Serhii & Botsman, Anastasiia & Braterska, Nataliia & Hriekova, Olesia & Drobotova, Yevheniia & Tolmachov, Illya, 2025. "Planning passafeguard in conflict zones and assessment of public transport stop accessibility to shelters," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002976
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002976
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.