Author
Listed:
- Guo, Tao
- Wu, Hao
- Lu, Qing-Long
- Antoniou, Constantinos
Abstract
Urban Air Mobility (UAM) holds significant promise for enhancing travel efficiency and improving regional accessibility. However, policymakers face a fundamental challenge: infrastructure planning decisions must often be made before demand is known. This study develops a single-stage stochastic optimization framework with sequential decision layers that mirrors real-world planning constraints. It allows agencies to determine vertiport locations and trip allocations before individual mode choices are realized, incorporating behavioral uncertainty via discrete choice modeling and Monte Carlo simulation. To ensure computational tractability at realistic scales, an improved greedy algorithm (GRD-U) is introduced and benchmarked against established heuristics. Experiments on synthetic instances show that cost-saving potential is greatest in larger regions with low road connectivity, as well as unicentric or dispersed demand patterns. A real-world case study in the Munich Metropolitan Area confirms the framework’s applicability, demonstrating notable improvements in generalized travel cost savings, demand coverage, and accessibility compared to existing siting strategies. A sensitivity analysis highlights how UAM performance responds to changes in operational parameters, such as cruise speed, pricing strategies, and vertiport quantity. The framework offers a transparent and behaviorally grounded tool for early-stage UAM planning. It enables public agencies to anticipate demand patterns under uncertainty, weigh trade-offs between investment scale and system performance, and align infrastructure planning with equity and efficiency goals. These contributions provide practical decision support for cities navigating the complexities of UAM deployment.
Suggested Citation
Guo, Tao & Wu, Hao & Lu, Qing-Long & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2025.
"Planning UAM network under uncertain travelers’ preferences: A sequential two-layer stochastic optimization approach,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002605
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104632
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.