IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v200y2025ics0965856425002526.html

Travel time reliability, psychological choice mechanisms, sustainable transport decisions and smart urban development

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Zheng
  • Zeng, Jingjing
  • Hensher, David A.
  • Wu, Chenyang

Abstract

Existing land use-transportation interaction (LUTI) models largely overlooked important choice mechanisms that shape travel decision making under uncertainty, such as risk attitude and ambiguity attitude. Within a LUTI model, this study embeds a behavioral framework which accommodates the two behavioral elements into a spatial general equilibrium model. In this improved LUTI model, endogenous commuting costs are influenced by commuters’ choice behaviors in the presence of travel time variability inherent in transport systems, and, more importantly, choice outcomes are jointly determined by their taste preferences and ambiguity/risk attitudes. We then apply the model system to an Australian city, where our baseline results, compared to a conventional model that omits risk and ambiguity attitudes, align closely with observed market evidence. This alignment reinforces the validity of our behaviorally realistic modeling approach. Furthermore, simulations of improved travel time reliability reveal the potential to smart development by promoting sustainable travel and urban growth. Our findings underscore the critical role of psychological choice mechanisms in deepening the understanding of travel behavior dynamics and land use patterns. Based on the study evidence, we offer both case-specific suggestions and broader policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Zheng & Zeng, Jingjing & Hensher, David A. & Wu, Chenyang, 2025. "Travel time reliability, psychological choice mechanisms, sustainable transport decisions and smart urban development," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002526
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002526
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takayama, Yuki & Ikeda, Kiyohiro & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2020. "Stability and sustainability of urban systems under commuting and transportation costs," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Zhang, Wenjia & Kockelman, Kara M., 2016. "Congestion pricing effects on firm and household location choices in monocentric and polycentric cities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Ng, Ka Fai & Lo, Hong K., 2015. "Optimal housing supply in a bid-rent equilibrium framework," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 62-78.
    4. Fang, Jia & Yan, Xiang & Bejleri, Ilir & Chen, Changjie, 2022. "Which trip destination matters? Estimating the influence of the built environment on mode choice for home-based complex tours," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. Mohammed Abdellaoui & Aurelien Baillon & Laetitia Placido & Peter P. Wakker, 2011. "The Rich Domain of Uncertainty: Source Functions and Their Experimental Implementation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(2), pages 695-723, April.
    6. Zhang, Wenjia & Kockelman, Kara M., 2016. "Optimal policies in cities with congestion and agglomeration externalities: Congestion tolls, labor subsidies, and place-based strategies," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 64-86.
    7. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    8. Camille Tevenart & Marielle Brunette, 2021. "Role of Farmers’ Risk and Ambiguity Preferences on Fertilization Decisions: An Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, August.
    9. Muniz, Ivan & Galindo, Anna, 2005. "Urban form and the ecological footprint of commuting. The case of Barcelona," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 499-514, December.
    10. Anas, Alex, 2020. "The cost of congestion and the benefits of congestion pricing: A general equilibrium analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 110-137.
    11. Susan Shaheen & Elliot Martin & Mikaela Hoffman-Stapleton, 2021. "Shared mobility and urban form impacts: a case study of peer-to-peer (P2P) carsharing in the US," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 141-158, March.
    12. Liu, Peng & Xu, Shu-Xian & Ong, Ghim Ping & Tian, Qiong & Ma, Shoufeng, 2021. "Effect of autonomous vehicles on travel and urban characteristics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 128-148.
    13. Marc Cowling & George Tanewski, 2019. "On the productive efficiency of Australian businesses: firm size and age class effects," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 739-752, October.
    14. Delventhal, Matthew J. & Kwon, Eunjee & Parkhomenko, Andrii, 2022. "JUE Insight: How do cities change when we work from home?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    15. Gilles Duranton & Diego Puga, 2020. "The Economics of Urban Density," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 3-26, Summer.
    16. Quiggin, John, 1982. "A theory of anticipated utility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 323-343, December.
    17. Weihua Zhao, 2020. "The general equilibrium effects of high‐occupancy vehicle lanes on congestion, sprawl, energy use, and carbon emissions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 174-200, January.
    18. Dumortier, Jerome & Elobeid, Amani & Carriquiry, Miguel, 2022. "Light-duty vehicle fleet electrification in the United States and its effects on global agricultural markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    19. Li, Zheng & Hensher, David A. & Zeng, Jingjing, 2022. "Travel choice behaviour under uncertainty in real-market settings: A source-dependent utility approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Gelauff, George & Ossokina, Ioulia & Teulings, Coen, 2019. "Spatial and welfare effects of automated driving: Will cities grow, decline or both?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 277-294.
    21. Ilke Aydogan, 2021. "Prior Beliefs and Ambiguity Attitudes in Decision from Experience," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6934-6945, November.
    22. Magliocca, Nicholas & McConnell, Virginia & Walls, Margaret, 2015. "Exploring sprawl: Results from an economic agent-based model of land and housing markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 114-125.
    23. Vandyck, Toon & Rutherford, Thomas F., 2018. "Regional labor markets, commuting, and the economic impact of road pricing," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 217-236.
    24. Christophe Courbage & Richard Peter, 2021. "On the effect of uncertainty on personal vaccination decisions," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(11), pages 2937-2942, November.
    25. Kemel, Emmanuel & Paraschiv, Corina, 2013. "Prospect Theory for joint time and money consequences in risk and ambiguity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 81-95.
    26. Larson, William & Zhao, Weihua, 2020. "Self-driving cars and the city: Effects on sprawl, energy consumption, and housing affordability," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    27. Bimpou, Konstantina & Ferguson, Neil S., 2020. "Dynamic accessibility: Incorporating day-to-day travel time reliability into accessibility measurement," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    28. Turner, Matthew A., 2007. "A simple theory of smart growth and sprawl," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 21-44, January.
    29. Treb Allen & Costas Arkolakis, 2022. "The Welfare Effects of Transportation Infrastructure Improvements," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(6), pages 2911-2957.
    30. Zheng Li, 2020. "Experimental Evidence on Socioeconomic Differences in Risk‐Taking and Risk Premiums," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 96(313), pages 140-152, June.
    31. Li, Chen & Turmunkh, Uyanga & Wakker, Peter P., 2020. "Social and strategic ambiguity versus betrayal aversion," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 272-287.
    32. Marc-Lluís Vives & Oriel FeldmanHall, 2018. "Tolerance to ambiguous uncertainty predicts prosocial behavior," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    33. Craig R. Fox & Amos Tversky, 1998. "A Belief-Based Account of Decision Under Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(7), pages 879-895, July.
    34. Qi, Jin & Sim, Melvyn & Sun, Defeng & Yuan, Xiaoming, 2016. "Preferences for travel time under risk and ambiguity: Implications in path selection and network equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 264-284.
    35. Stephen Dimmock & Roy Kouwenberg & Olivia Mitchell & Kim Peijnenburg, 2015. "Estimating ambiguity preferences and perceptions in multiple prior models: Evidence from the field," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 219-244, December.
    36. Sarri, Paraskevi & Kaparias, Ioannis & Preston, John & Simmonds, David, 2023. "Using Land Use and Transportation Interaction (LUTI) models to determine land use effects from new vehicle transportation technologies; a regional scale of analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 91-111.
    37. Robert E. Lucas & Esteban Rossi-Hansberg, 2002. "On the Internal Structure of Cities," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1445-1476, July.
    38. Ng, Ka Fai & Lo, Hong K., 2017. "On joint railway and housing development: Housing-led versus railway-led schemes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 464-488.
    39. Hasselwander, Marc & Bigotte, Joao F. & Antunes, Antonio P. & Sigua, Ricardo G., 2022. "Towards sustainable transport in developing countries: Preliminary findings on the demand for mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) in Metro Manila," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 501-518.
    40. Aggelos Soteropoulos & Martin Berger & Francesco Ciari, 2019. "Impacts of automated vehicles on travel behaviour and land use: an international review of modelling studies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 29-49, January.
    41. Zhang, Xin & Zhong, Shiquan & Jia, Ning & Ling, Shuai & Yao, Wang & Ma, Shoufeng, 2024. "A barrier to the promotion of app-based ridesplitting: Travelers’ ambiguity aversion in mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    42. Ho, Chinh Q. & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2024. "Mobility-as-a-Service and the role of multimodality in the sustainability of urban mobility in developing and developed countries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 161-176.
    43. Xu, Shu-Xian & Liu, Tian-Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun & Liu, Ronghui, 2018. "Mode choice and railway subsidy in a congested monocentric city with endogenous population distribution," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 413-433.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Zheng & Hensher, David A. & Zeng, Jingjing, 2022. "Travel choice behaviour under uncertainty in real-market settings: A source-dependent utility approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Zeng, Jingjing & Li, Zheng & Hensher, David A., 2025. "Travel decision making under uncertainty and road traffic behavior: The multifold role of ambiguity attitude," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Xu, Shu-Xian & Liu, Tian-Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun & Wang, David Z.W., 2021. "Optimizing the number of employment subcenters to decentralize a congested city," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Zhihua Li & Julia Müller & Peter P. Wakker & Tong V. Wang, 2018. "The Rich Domain of Ambiguity Explored," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3227-3240, July.
    5. Henkel, Luca, 2024. "Experimental evidence on the relationship between perceived ambiguity and likelihood insensitivity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 312-338.
    6. Haotian Zhong & Wei Li, 2023. "What if autonomous vehicles had been introduced into cities? A counterfactual analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3198-3215, December.
    7. Thomas Astebro & Frank Fossen & Cédric Gutierrez, 2024. "Entrepreneurs: Clueless, Biased, Poor Heuristics, or Bayesian Machines?," Working Papers hal-04759301, HAL.
    8. Luo, Lichen & Parady, Giancarlos & Takami, Kiyoshi, 2024. "Evaluating the impact of automated vehicles on residential location distribution using activity-based accessibility: A case study of Japanese regional areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. Li, Baibing & Hensher, David A., 2017. "Risky weighting in discrete choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1-21.
    10. Robin Cubitt & Orestis Kopsacheilis & Chris Starmer, 2022. "An inquiry into the nature and causes of the Description - Experience gap," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 105-137, October.
    11. Mohammed Abdellaoui & Han Bleichrodt & Enrico Diecidue & Horst Zank, 2022. "Introduction to the Special Issue in Honor of Peter Wakker," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 433-444, April.
    12. Aurélien Baillon & Yoram Halevy & Chen Li, 2022. "Experimental elicitation of ambiguity attitude using the random incentive system," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(3), pages 1002-1023, June.
    13. Stephen G. Dimmock & Roy Kouwenberg & Peter P. Wakker, 2016. "Ambiguity Attitudes in a Large Representative Sample," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1363-1380, May.
    14. Doron Sonsino & Yaron Lahav & Yefim Roth, 2022. "Reaching for Returns in Retail Structured Investment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 466-486, January.
    15. Tscharaktschiew, Stefan & Reimann, Felix, 2025. "Cruising or Parking," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    16. Aurélien Baillon & Laure Cabantous & Peter Wakker, 2012. "Aggregating imprecise or conflicting beliefs: An experimental investigation using modern ambiguity theories," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 115-147, April.
    17. Foster, Gigi & Frijters, Paul & Schaffner, Markus & Torgler, Benno, 2018. "Expectation formation in an evolving game of uncertainty: New experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 379-405.
    18. Junyi Chai & Zhiquan Weng & Wenbin Liu, 2021. "Behavioral Decision Making in Normative and Descriptive Views: A Critical Review of Literature," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Jakusch, Sven Thorsten, 2017. "On the applicability of maximum likelihood methods: From experimental to financial data," SAFE Working Paper Series 148, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2017.
    20. Tsang, Ming, 2020. "Estimating uncertainty aversion using the source method in stylized tasks with varying degrees of uncertainty," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.