IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v199y2025ics0965856425002368.html

What shapes perceived accessibility? Unpacking the interplay of sociodemographics, latent perceptions, and traditional accessibility metrics

Author

Listed:
  • Soza-Parra, Jaime
  • Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio

Abstract

Accessibility, understood as how easily individuals can reach a desired destination, can be measured in multiple ways. Perceived accessible opportunities, which include those seen as viable alternatives and as feasible given personal and scheduling constraints, may vary from an analyst’s assessment when calculated accessibility measures are used. Our study explores how perceived accessibility is shaped by the interaction between sociodemographic attributes, latent perceptions of the built environment, and traditional accessibility indicators. Moreover, we investigate how accessibility indicators influence perceived accessibility for various services and examine the effects of distance thresholds to determine how strongly the concept of the neighbourhood influences residents’ perceptions of accessibility. To do so, we use a representative sample of 354 individuals living in a residential neighbourhood in Santiago de Chile in 2019. In addition to mobility diaries and sociodemographic characterisation, the respondents indicated whether eight different services were accessible in the neighbourhood and, if so, whether they made use of them. A hybrid discrete choice model was estimated to understand the interplay between different factors and their role in the perception of accessibility for each service. Our results indicate that even though each is important on its own, there is no evidence suggesting that one accessibility indicator is superior to another when studying accessibility perception. In addition, we find both direct and indirect effects of gender and age, which occur via latent perceptions of the use of public space and infrastructure quality. Finally, we found evidence supporting the idea that the neighbourhood corresponds to the immediate surroundings of the residential household and that perceived accessibility is significantly different depending on the type of service studied. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the underlying dimensions affecting perceived accessibility in the Global South, providing important evidence for decision makers on the complexities that must be considered when designing effective and inclusive proximity-based policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Soza-Parra, Jaime & Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio, 2025. "What shapes perceived accessibility? Unpacking the interplay of sociodemographics, latent perceptions, and traditional accessibility metrics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002368
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002368
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pot, Felix Johan & van Wee, Bert & Tillema, Taede, 2021. "Perceived accessibility: What it is and why it differs from calculated accessibility measures based on spatial data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. van Wee, Bert, 2016. "Accessible accessibility research challenges," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 9-16.
    3. Lättman, Katrin & Olsson, Lars E. & Friman, Margareta, 2016. "Development and test of the Perceived Accessibility Scale (PAC) in public transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 257-263.
    4. David Levinson & Hao Wu, 2020. "Towards a general theory of access," Working Papers 2022-01, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    5. Shunfeng Song, 1996. "Some Tests of Alternative Accessibility Measures: A Population Density Approach," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 72(4), pages 474-482.
    6. Guimpert, Ignacio & Hurtubia, Ricardo, 2018. "Measuring, understanding and modelling the Walking Neighborhood as a function of built environment and socioeconomic variables," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 32-44.
    7. Vafeiadis, Evangelos & Elldér, Erik, 2024. "Correlates of perceived accessibility across transport modes and trip purposes: Insights from a Swedish survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    8. Elmira Jamei & Melissa Chan & Hing Wah Chau & Eric Gaisie & Katrin Lättman, 2022. "Perceived Accessibility and Key Influencing Factors in Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    10. Ryan, Jean & Pereira, Rafael H.M., 2021. "What are we missing when we measure accessibility? Comparing calculated and self-reported accounts among older people," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    11. Pot, Felix Johan & Koster, Sierdjan & Tillema, Taede, 2023. "Perceived accessibility and residential self-selection in the Netherlands," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Negm, Hisham & De Vos, Jonas & Pot, Felix & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2025. "Perceived accessibility: A literature review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Pot, Felix Johan & Koster, Sierdjan & Tillema, Taede, 2023. "Perceived accessibility in Dutch rural areas: Bridging the gap with accessibility based on spatial data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 170-184.
    14. Roper, Josephine & Ng, Matthew & Huck, Jonathan & Pettit, Christopher, 2024. "A participatory mapping approach to capturing perceived walkability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    15. Lola Blandin & Giovanni Vecchio & Ricardo Hurtubia & Ignacio Tiznado-Aitken, 2024. "Car dependency in the urban margins: The influence of perceived accessibility on mode choice," Post-Print hal-04659649, HAL.
    16. Jonas De Vos & Katrin Lättman & Anna-Lena van der Vlugt & Janina Welsch & Noriko Otsuka, 2023. "Determinants and effects of perceived walkability: a literature review, conceptual model and research agenda," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 303-324, March.
    17. Hess, Stephane & Palma, David, 2019. "Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Cascetta, Ennio & Cartenì, Armando & Montanino, Marcello, 2016. "A behavioral model of accessibility based on the number of available opportunities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 45-58.
    19. Andrew Daly & Stephane Hess & Bhanu Patruni & Dimitris Potoglou & Charlene Rohr, 2012. "Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: a study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 267-297, March.
    20. Blandin, Lola & Vecchio, Giovanni & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio, 2024. "Car dependency in the urban margins: The influence of perceived accessibility on mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    21. Páez, Antonio & Scott, Darren M. & Morency, Catherine, 2012. "Measuring accessibility: positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 141-153.
    22. Zhu, Le & Lucas, Karen & Hess, Martin, 2024. "Understanding the relationship between perceived accessibility, housing and transport equity of different types of residents: A structural equation modelling approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Negm, Hisham & De Vos, Jonas & Pot, Felix & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2025. "Perceived accessibility: A literature review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    2. Negm, Hisham & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2025. "Subjectivity matters: Investigating the relationship between perceived accessibility and travel behaviour," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Pham, Son Truong & Nguyen, Thao Phuong Thi & Su, Diep Ngoc & Luu, Tuan Trong & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2025. "Exploring the switch to urban train services: The impact of perceived accessibility and its moderating effects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Zha, Wenbin & Li, Jian, 2025. "Understanding commuters' perceived accessibility and travel intentions under rainstorm warnings in Shanghai, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 276-294.
    5. Pot, Felix Johan, 2025. "Perceived accessibility and transport equity: Does satisfaction imply perceived sufficiency of opportunities?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Yuen, Weilun & Lee, Leonard & Leong, Waiyan & Carmon, Ziv & Chen, Charlene & Ng, Kai Xuan & Chong, Wen Wei, 2025. "Perceived accessibility of public transport predicts intention to give up car ownership but objective accessibility does not," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. Moleman, Milan L. & Kroesen, Maarten, 2025. "Revealing accessibility disparities: A latent class analysis linking objective and subjective accessibility measures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. Zhang, Yuerong & Cao, Yanghui, 2025. "Towards a combined framework for public electric vehicle charger accessibility in London," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    9. Blandin, Lola & Vecchio, Giovanni & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio, 2024. "Car dependency in the urban margins: The influence of perceived accessibility on mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Moleman, Milan L. & Kroesen, Maarten, 2025. "Exploring the interplay of transport, social, and geographical disadvantages and its effect on perceived inaccessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    11. Arranz-López, Aldo & Acker, Veronique Van & Dijst, Martin, 2025. "Exploring the influence of Internet-related perceptions and e-shopping on spatiotemporal accessibility perceptions: A study of social housing beneficiaries in Luxembourg," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Vafeiadis, Evangelos & Elldér, Erik, 2024. "Correlates of perceived accessibility across transport modes and trip purposes: Insights from a Swedish survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    13. Oviedo, Daniel & Nieto-Combariza, Maria José & Chong, Alexandria Z.W., 2025. "Everyday perceived accessibility in unwalkable cities in Sub-Saharan Africa," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Orrego-Oñate, Jaime & Marquet, Oriol, 2025. "The role of perceived and objective accessibility in shaping walking behavior: Insights from mid-sized Spanish cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    15. Juschten, Maria & Hössinger, Reinhard, 2026. "Assessing commuting-related accessibility inequalities in rural Innviertel, Austria," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    16. Pot, Felix Johan & Koster, Sierdjan & Tillema, Taede, 2023. "Perceived accessibility in Dutch rural areas: Bridging the gap with accessibility based on spatial data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 170-184.
    17. Pot, Felix Johan & van Wee, Bert & Tillema, Taede, 2021. "Perceived accessibility: What it is and why it differs from calculated accessibility measures based on spatial data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Roper, Josephine & Ng, Matthew & Huck, Jonathan & Pettit, Christopher, 2024. "A participatory mapping approach to capturing perceived walkability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    19. El Murr, Karl & Boisjoly, Genevieve & Waygood, E.O.D., 2023. "Measuring accessibility to parks: Analyzing the relationship between self-reported and calculated measures," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    20. Rauch, S. & Wieland, T. & Rauh, J., 2025. "Accessibility of food - A multilevel approach comparing a choice based model with perceived accessibility in Mainfranken, Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.