Author
Listed:
- Wang, Hui
- Tsoi, Ka Ho
- Loo, Becky P.Y.
Abstract
The 15-minute city concept has underscored a commitment to redefine urban life with a more sustainable future. Given the challenges of achieving the 15-minute city and diverse geographic contexts, this study proposes an evaluation framework for assessing the feasibility and progress towards this goal across 35 major cities worldwide in Europe, South America, North America, Asia and Oceania. This framework is a time-sensitive and systematic approach integrating place-based accessibility and population-based measures. Spatial boundaries, facility data, General Transit Feed Specification data and population metrics are used as inputs. There are two key series of indicators: the Basic 15-minute Indicators (1opp15MinC), ensuring at least one opportunity for each essential facility type, and the Optimal 15-minute Indicators (3opp15MinC), providing at least three opportunities for each facility type. The latter emphasises the importance of diversity and choice in service provision. The progress of these 35 cities is then classified into one of three categories: “achieved,” “achievable,” and “unlikely”, using the 50% and 25% thresholds. Our findings indicate that European cities are closest to achieving the basic 15-minute city goals, whereas Australian cities encounter significant challenges. Extending the analysis to a 30-minute timeframe enhances feasibility, particularly in North America, Asia and Australia. Furthermore, we examine the impact of urban form, demonstrating that a decentralised concentration pattern substantially improves access to essential services. This study provides strategic insights for urban planners and policymakers to adapt the 15-minute city concept to various urban contexts and population densities.
Suggested Citation
Wang, Hui & Tsoi, Ka Ho & Loo, Becky P.Y., 2025.
"An assessment framework for 15-minute Cities: Progress worldwide and the impact of urban form,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002113
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104583
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.