IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v199y2025ics0965856425002058.html

Investigating the factors influencing intercity travel mode choice in urban agglomerations: Insights from a three-phase framework

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Zhixi
  • Sun, Daniel
  • Zhao, Yangyang
  • Peng, Hui

Abstract

The accelerated urbanization has led to a continuous increase in transportation demand within urban agglomerations. Accurately predicting intercity travel mode choices and exploring the key influencing factors are crucial for comprehensive regional transportation planning. This study proposes a novel three-phase machine learning (ML)-based framework to ensure modeling accuracy while revealing the mechanisms influencing intercity travel mode choices. Utilizing travel survey data from the Xi’an-Baoji intercity passenger transport corridor within the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration of China, we employed three state-of-the-art ML classifiers, named Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Deep Neural Network (DNN), to predict the travel mode choices. Then, SHAP-based analysis was introduced to reveal the relative importance of different factors in mode choice and examined the interaction effects among the factors. The results demonstrated that the XGBoost model achieved the best predictive performance, particularly exhibiting significant advantages in probability assessment metrics. Travel distance was revealed with the most significant impact on mode choice, which exhibits nonlinear relationships and threshold effects across different modes, reflecting the trends in mode shifts at varying distance levels. Furthermore, compared to long-distance intercity travel, travelers demonstrated a higher sensitivity to the cost-effectiveness of the mode choices. The findings may provide policy and practical implications for transit-oriented strategies in achieving the sustainable development of urban agglomerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Zhixi & Sun, Daniel & Zhao, Yangyang & Peng, Hui, 2025. "Investigating the factors influencing intercity travel mode choice in urban agglomerations: Insights from a three-phase framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002058
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002058
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keunhyun Park & Sadegh Sabouri & Torrey Lyons & Guang Tian & Reid Ewing, 2020. "Intrazonal or interzonal? Improving intrazonal travel forecast in a four-step travel demand model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2087-2108, October.
    2. Mattson, Jeremy & Hough, Jill & Varma, Amiy, 2018. "Estimating demand for rural intercity bus services," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 68-75.
    3. Sun, Xiaoqian & Wandelt, Sebastian & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "Comparative accessibility of Chinese airports and high-speed railway stations: A high-resolution, yet scalable framework based on open data," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Susilo, Yusak O. & Cats, Oded, 2014. "Exploring key determinants of travel satisfaction for multi-modal trips by different traveler groups," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 366-380.
    5. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, November.
    6. Daniel McFadden, 1986. "The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 275-297.
    7. Allard, Ryan F. & Moura, Filipe, 2018. "Effect of transport transfer quality on intercity passenger mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 89-107.
    8. Wang, Shenhao & Mo, Baichuan & Zheng, Yunhan & Hess, Stephane & Zhao, Jinhua, 2024. "Comparing hundreds of machine learning and discrete choice models for travel demand modeling: An empirical benchmark," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. Champahom, Thanapong & Wisutwattanasak, Panuwat & Jomnonkwao, Sajjakaj & Laphrom, Wimon & Khampirat, Buratin & Ratanavaraha, Vatanavongs, 2025. "Gender-specific insights into intercity railway service quality: Navigating the new normal for enhanced equity," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Madio, Leonardo, 2020. "Intermodal competition and substitution. HSR versus air transport: Understanding the socio-economic determinants of modal choice," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Wu, Peijie & Chen, Tianyi & Diew Wong, Yiik & Meng, Xianghai & Wang, Xueqin & Liu, Wei, 2023. "Exploring key spatio-temporal features of crash risk hot spots on urban road network: A machine learning approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    12. Baak, M. & Koopman, R. & Snoek, H. & Klous, S., 2020. "A new correlation coefficient between categorical, ordinal and interval variables with Pearson characteristics," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    13. Gerson Tontini & Érica Souza Mazato & Paula Carolina Ferretti & Soraya Bachmann Sousa, 2024. "Factors influencing intention to use ridesharing or intercity bus services: a nonlinear point of View," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2103-2138, December.
    14. Zhou, Heng & Norman, Richard & Xia, Jianhong(Cecilia) & Hughes, Brett & Kelobonye, Keone & Nikolova, Gabi & Falkmer, Torbjorn, 2020. "Analysing travel mode and airline choice using latent class modelling: A case study in Western Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 187-205.
    15. Badiola, Nicolás & Raveau, Sebastián & Galilea, Patricia, 2019. "Modelling preferences towards activities and their effect on departure time choices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 39-51.
    16. Van Acker, Veronique & Kessels, Roselinde & Palhazi Cuervo, Daniel & Lannoo, Steven & Witlox, Frank, 2020. "Preferences for long-distance coach transport: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 759-779.
    17. Xu, Yiming & Yan, Xiang & Liu, Xinyu & Zhao, Xilei, 2021. "Identifying key factors associated with ridesplitting adoption rate and modeling their nonlinear relationships," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 170-188.
    18. Hess, Stephane & Spitz, Greg & Bradley, Mark & Coogan, Matt, 2018. "Analysis of mode choice for intercity travel: Application of a hybrid choice model to two distinct US corridors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 547-567.
    19. Xiao Fu & Yi Zhang & Juan de Dios Ortúzar & Guonian Lü, 2025. "Activity-travel pattern inference based on multi-source big data," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 26-48, January.
    20. Wang, Han & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2024. "Effects of high-speed rail on intercity travels, utility and social welfare in urban agglomerations: A game-theoretic perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    21. Capurso, Mauro & Hess, Stephane & Dekker, Thijs, 2019. "Modelling the role of consideration of alternatives in mode choice: An application on the Rome-Milan corridor," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 170-184.
    22. Yu, JiangBo & Weng, JianCheng & Wang, Tian & Lin, PengFei & Sun, YuXing & Chai, JiaoLong, 2025. "How do differences in airline passengers’ satisfaction with connectivity modes affect last-mile travel choices? A SALC modeling based on RRM," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    23. Li, Xinming & Hossein Rashidi, Taha & Koo, Tay T.R., 2023. "Tourists’ travel mode and length of stay: Application of a fully nested Archimedean copula structure," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    24. Zhang, Xiaojian & Zhou, Zhengze & Xu, Yiming & Zhao, Xilei, 2024. "Analyzing spatial heterogeneity of ridesourcing usage determinants using explainable machine learning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    25. Krueger, Rico & Bierlaire, Michel & Daziano, Ricardo A. & Rashidi, Taha H. & Bansal, Prateek, 2021. "Evaluating the predictive abilities of mixed logit models with unobserved inter- and intra-individual heterogeneity," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    26. Long, Yi & Ao, Yibin & Li, Haimei & Bahmani, Homa & Li, Mingyang, 2024. "Non-linear effects of children's daily travel distance on their travel mode choice considering different destinations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    27. Ashik, F.R. & Sreezon, A.I.Z. & Rahman, M.H. & Zafri, N.M. & Labib, S.M., 2024. "Built environment influences commute mode choice in a global south megacity context: Insights from explainable machine learning approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    28. Román, Concepción & Martín, Juan Carlos & Espino, Raquel & Cherchi, Elisabetta & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios & Rizzi, Luis Ignacio & González, Rosa Marina & Amador, Francisco Javier, 2014. "Valuation of travel time savings for intercity travel: The Madrid-Barcelona corridor," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 105-117.
    29. Anil NP Koushik & M. Manoj & N. Nezamuddin, 2020. "Machine learning applications in activity-travel behaviour research: a review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 288-311, May.
    30. Li, Xiaowei & Tang, Junqing & Hu, Xiaojiao & Wang, Wei, 2020. "Assessing intercity multimodal choice behavior in a Touristy City: A factor analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    31. Zamparini, Luca & Vergori, Anna Serena, 2021. "Sustainable mobility at tourist destinations: The relevance of habits and the role of policies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tian, Zeyuan & Zhao, Yulin & Dong, Zhi & Sun, Daniel Jian & Dong, Zhiyu, 2025. "Analyzing the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of carbon emissions from road transportation in four Chinese urban agglomerations: An empirical case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Yue & Gan, Hongcheng & Postorino, Maria Nadia & Wang, Ke & Wu, Xuelian, 2025. "Young people preferences about enhanced transportation services for intercity trips: An integrated choice and latent variable approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Huan, Ning & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki & Yao, Enjian, 2023. "Seamless air-HSR intermodal solution: Behavioural model-based scheduling of airline timetable and airfare," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Chen, Lin & Yao, Enjian & Yang, Yang & Pan, Long & Liu, ShaSha, 2024. "Understanding passengers' intermodal travel behavior to improve air-rail service: A case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Mabit, Stefan E., 2026. "Mixed logit applications in travel behaviour research," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    5. Rategh, Yalda & Tamannaei, Mohammad & Zarei, Hamid, 2022. "A game-theoretic approach to an oligopolistic transportation market: Coopetition between incumbent systems subject to the entrance threat of an HSR service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 144-171.
    6. Rotaris, Lucia & Giansoldati, Marco & Scorrano, Mariangela, 2021. "The slow uptake of electric cars in Italy and Slovenia. Evidence from a stated-preference survey and the role of knowledge and environmental awareness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-18.
    7. Zhu, Siying & Jia, Shuai & Sun, Qinghe & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "An empirical study of China–Singapore International Land–Sea Trade Corridor: Analysis from supply and demand sides," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Huan, Ning & Yao, Enjian & Xiao, Yang, 2025. "Tourist preferences for air-high-speed rail intermodal transport: Insights from a mega-city region," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    9. Su, Min & Fan, Wenhang & Hu, Baoyang & Su, Ziqi, 2025. "Impact of competition between high-speed rail and civil aviation on urban economic growth," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 164-178.
    10. Wang, Hui & Hu, Xiaowei & Zhang, Yantang & An, Shi, 2025. "Analysis of ride-hailing service discontinuity: Links to built environment and public transportation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    11. Ting Li & Robert J. Kauffman & Eric van Heck & Peter Vervest & Benedict G. C. Dellaert, 2014. "Consumer Informedness and Firm Information Strategy," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 345-363, June.
    12. Honora Smith & Christine Currie & Pornpimol Chaiwuttisak & Andreas Kyprianou, 2018. "Patient choice modelling: how do patients choose their hospitals?," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 259-268, June.
    13. van der Kroon, Bianca & Brouwer, Roy & van Beukering, Pieter J.H., 2014. "The impact of the household decision environment on fuel choice behavior," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 236-247.
    14. Caputo, Vincenzina & Aprile, Maria Carmela & Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr., 2011. "Consumers’ Valuation for European food quality labels: Importance of Label Information Provision," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114324, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Axel C. Mühlbacher & Anika Kaczynski & Peter Zweifel & F. Reed Johnson, 2016. "Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Hongshen Sun & Juanjuan Zhang, 2025. "From Model Choice to Model Belief: Establishing a New Measure for LLM-Based Research," Papers 2512.23184, arXiv.org.
    17. Kim, Seheon & Rasouli, Soora, 2022. "The influence of latent lifestyle on acceptance of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS): A hierarchical latent variable and latent class approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 304-319.
    18. Emami, Maryam & Haghshenas, Hossein & Talebian, Ahmadreza & Kermanshahi, Shahab, 2022. "A game theoretic approach to study the impact of transportation policies on the competition between transit and private car in the urban context," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 320-337.
    19. Daziano, Ricardo A., 2015. "Inference on mode preferences, vehicle purchases, and the energy paradox using a Bayesian structural choice model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-26.
    20. Reema Bera & Bhargab Maitra, 2021. "Analyzing Prospective Owners’ Choice Decision towards Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles in Urban India: A Stated Preference Discrete Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425002058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.