IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v196y2025ics0965856425000801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in choice of transportation mode by residents of 15-minute cities according to destination amenities: Break away from car dominant city

Author

Listed:
  • Murooka, Taichi
  • Kumeyama, Kanta
  • Taniguchi, Mamoru

Abstract

The 15-minute city is an urban design concept that promotes access to amenities and services within 15 min of one’s home, aiming to reduce environmental impact and improve health. However, even if proximity is achieved, residents do not always choose to use active transport modes such as walking or cycling, and car dependency could undermine the goal of creating a healthy and environmentally friendly society. This study explored the transition from an “accessible” 15-minute city to a “carless” 15-minute city, with a focus on understanding why residents still use cars despite proximity to amenities and how that proximity influences transport mode choices. An original survey of walking times and transportation choices in several regions of Japan was conducted, focusing on key amenities such as grocery stores, health care, and financial services. Two logit models were used: one analyzed overall trends in transportation mode choice of all respondents (n = 975), and the other focused on residents of a “sufficient” 15-minute city (n = 197) who can reach all 3 amenities within a 15-minute walk from their home. Factors such as proximity, population density, and income were included in the models. In the first logit model, shorter distances to amenities increased the likelihood of walking or cycling. However, the second model revealed that over 70 % of residents still used cars despite proximity to amenities, although lower-income groups were more likely to walk or cycle. Population density and income levels were significant factors in both models, but land-use diversity had little effect on transportation mode choice. To achieve a “carless” 15-minute city, all necessary amenities should be close to residential areas, but it is also important from a policy standpoint to increase population density and implement more comprehensive urban planning strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Murooka, Taichi & Kumeyama, Kanta & Taniguchi, Mamoru, 2025. "Differences in choice of transportation mode by residents of 15-minute cities according to destination amenities: Break away from car dominant city," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:196:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000801
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000801
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reid Ewing & Robert Cervero, 2010. "Travel and the Built Environment," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 265-294.
    2. Cynthia Chen & Hongmian Gong & Robert Paaswell, 2008. "Role of the built environment on mode choice decisions: additional evidence on the impact of density," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 285-299, May.
    3. Poorthuis, Ate & Zook, Matthew, 2023. "Moving the 15-minute city beyond the urban core: The role of accessibility and public transport in the Netherlands," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Basu, Rounaq & Sevtsuk, Andres, 2022. "How do street attributes affect willingness-to-walk? City-wide pedestrian route choice analysis using big data from Boston and San Francisco," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1-19.
    5. Teixeira, João Filipe & Silva, Cecília & Seisenberger, Sebastian & Büttner, Benjamin & McCormick, Bartosz & Papa, Enrica & Cao, Mengqiu, 2024. "Classifying 15-minute Cities: A review of worldwide practices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    6. Poorthuis, Ate & Zook, Matthew, 2023. "Moving the 15-minute city beyond the urban core: the role of accessibility and public transport in The Netherlands," OSF Preprints 4adfq, Center for Open Science.
    7. Vafeiadis, Evangelos & Elldér, Erik, 2024. "Correlates of perceived accessibility across transport modes and trip purposes: Insights from a Swedish survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    8. Handy, Susan L., 1992. "Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Neo-Traditional Development and Its Implications for Non-work Travel," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7gs0p1nc, University of California Transportation Center.
    9. repec:osf:osfxxx:4adfq_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Deka, Devajyoti & Wang, Chihuangji, 2024. "An investigation into the potential use of information and communication technologies by trip-deprived older adults in New Jersey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Kevin Manaugh & Ahmed El-Geneidy, 2012. "What makes travel 'local': Defining and understanding local travel behaviour," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 5(3), pages 15-27.
    12. Shanqi Zhang & Feng Zhen & Yu Kong & Tashi Lobsang & Sicong Zou, 2023. "Towards a 15-minute city: A network-based evaluation framework," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(2), pages 500-514, February.
    13. Jinhyun Hong & Qing Shen & Lei Zhang, 2014. "How do built-environment factors affect travel behavior? A spatial analysis at different geographic scales," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 419-440, May.
    14. Liang Guo & Wenjun Cheng & Chang Liu & Qinghao Zhang & Shuo Yang, 2023. "Exploring the Spatial Heterogeneity and Influence Factors of Daily Travel Carbon Emissions in Metropolitan Areas: From the Perspective of the 15-min City," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bereitschaft, Bradley, 2020. "Gentrification and the evolution of commuting behavior within America's urban cores, 2000–2015," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Wu, Guoqiang & Hong, Jinhyun, 2022. "An analysis of the role of residential location on the relationships between time spent online and non-mandatory activity-travel time use over time," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu & Yu, Bin & Ju, Yang, 2021. "Non-linear associations between zonal built environment attributes and transit commuting mode choice accounting for spatial heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 22-35.
    4. Chowdhury, Tufayel & Scott, Darren M., 2020. "An analysis of the built environment and auto travel in Halifax, Canada," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 23-33.
    5. Tae-Hyoung Tommy Gim, 2017. "Full Random Coefficients Multilevel Modeling of the Relationship between Land Use and Trip Time on Weekdays and Weekends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Shen, Qing & Chen, Peng & Pan, Haixiao, 2016. "Factors affecting car ownership and mode choice in rail transit-supported suburbs of a large Chinese city," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 31-44.
    7. Seungil Yum, 2020. "The association between minority racial/ethnic groups and travel mode choices," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1017-1044, September.
    8. Longzhu Xiao & Linchuan Yang & Jixiang Liu & Hongtai Yang, 2020. "Built Environment Correlates of the Propensity of Walking and Cycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Bindong Sun & Chun Yin, 2020. "Impacts of a multi-scale built environment and its corresponding moderating effects on commute duration in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(10), pages 2115-2130, August.
    10. Ding, Chuan & Zhou, Xinyu & Jason Cao, Xinyu & Yang, Jiawen, 2023. "Spatial and mediation analysis of the influences of residential and workplace built environments on commuting by car," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    11. Li, Jingjing & Kim, Changjoo & Sang, Sunhee, 2018. "Exploring impacts of land use characteristics in residential neighborhood and activity space on non-work travel behaviors," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 141-147.
    12. Faizeh Hatami & Jean-Claude Thill, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evaluation of the Built Environment’s Impact on Commuting Duration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Lo, A. W.-T. & Houston, D., 2018. "How do compact, accessible, and walkable communities promote gender equality in spatial behavior?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 42-54.
    14. Hong, Jinhyun & Philip McArthur, David & Stewart, Joanna L., 2020. "Can providing safe cycling infrastructure encourage people to cycle more when it rains? The use of crowdsourced cycling data (Strava)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 109-121.
    15. Guan, Xiaodong & Wang, Donggen, 2019. "Influences of the built environment on travel: A household-based perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 710-724.
    16. Phani Kumar, P. & Ravi Sekhar, Ch. & Parida, Manoranjan, 2018. "Residential dissonance in TOD neighborhoods," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 166-177.
    17. Hong, Jinhyun & Thakuriah, Piyushimita Vonu, 2018. "Examining the relationship between different urbanization settings, smartphone use to access the Internet and trip frequencies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 11-18.
    18. Negm, Hisham & De Vos, Jonas & Pot, Felix & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2025. "Perceived accessibility: A literature review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    19. Henrikki Tenkanen & Rafael H. M. Pereira & Elsa Arcaute & Marta C. Gonzalez, 2023. "Advances in geospatial approaches to transport networks and sustainable mobility," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(8), pages 2009-2016, October.
    20. Zuo, Ting & Wei, Heng & Liu, Hao & Yang, Y. Jeffrey, 2019. "Bi-level optimization approach for configuring population and employment distributions with minimized vehicle travel demand," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 161-172.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:196:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.