IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v170y2026icp11-25.html

Correlation between multiple protective health behaviors can determine the outcome of disease spread

Author

Listed:
  • Mehta, Rohan S.

Abstract

The impact of human health-related behavior on the spread of the disease continues to be prominent due to the proliferation of sentiment against public health-promoting behaviors. The recent SARS-COV-2 pandemic brought these effects into sharp focus. In the process, we have learned that our current understanding of how human behavior affects disease spread is insufficient in scope and intricacy. In particular, how different health-related behaviors themselves interact with each other, and how those interactions affect disease spread, is largely unknown. In this paper, we use a coupled-contagion model to study the interaction of two different health behaviors — vaccination and mask-wearing. We study how a positive or negative association between these behaviors — e.g. a pro-vaccine person may be more or less likely to be pro-mask-wearing — affects disease dynamics. We find that the strength of such an association alone can determine the outcome of disease spread in the short term and the long term. In addition to studying human health-related behaviors separately, it is vitally important to understand how these behaviors interact with each other and how these associations affect the outcomes of epidemics.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehta, Rohan S., 2026. "Correlation between multiple protective health behaviors can determine the outcome of disease spread," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 11-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:170:y:2026:i:c:p:11-25
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2026.04.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580926000316
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2026.04.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:170:y:2026:i:c:p:11-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/theoretical-population-biology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.