IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v144y2022icp70-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analytical Bayesian models to quantify pest eradication success or species absence using zero-sighting records

Author

Listed:
  • Barnes, B.
  • Parsa, M.
  • Giannini, F.
  • Ramsey, D.

Abstract

It is not possible to establish the absence of a population with certainty using imperfect zero-sighting records, but absence can be inferred. In this paper we use Bayesian methods to formulate analytical inferred distributions and statistics. When such formulations are available, they offer a highly efficient and powerful means of analysis. Our purpose is to provide accessible and versatile formulations to support an assessment of population absence for management decisions, using data from a series of regular and targeted surveys with zero-sightings. The stochastic processes considered here are prior population size, growth and imperfect detection, which are combined into a single distribution with sufficient flexibility to accommodate alternative distributions for each of the driving processes. Analytical solutions formulated include the inferred mean and variance for population size or number of infested survey-units, the probability of absence, the probability of a series of negative surveys conditional on presence, and the probability a population is first detected in a given survey, although we also formulate other statistics and provide explicit thresholds designed to support management decisions. Our formulation and results are straightforward to apply and provide insight into the nonlinear interactions and general characteristics of such systems. Although motivated by an assessment of population absence following a pest eradication program, results are also relevant to the status of threatened species, to ‘proof-of-freedom’ requirements for trade, and for inferring population size when a population is first detected.

Suggested Citation

  • Barnes, B. & Parsa, M. & Giannini, F. & Ramsey, D., 2022. "Analytical Bayesian models to quantify pest eradication success or species absence using zero-sighting records," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 70-80.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:144:y:2022:i:c:p:70-80
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2021.10.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004058092100071X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2021.10.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Caley & Simon C Barry, 2014. "Quantifying Extinction Probabilities from Sighting Records: Inference and Uncertainties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barnes, B. & Parsa, M. & Giannini, F. & Ramsey, D., 2023. "Analytical Bayesian approach for the design of surveillance and control programs to assess pest-eradication success," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1-11.
    2. Peter Caley & David S L Ramsey & Simon C Barry, 2015. "Inferring the Distribution and Demography of an Invasive Species from Sighting Data: The Red Fox Incursion into Tasmania," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:144:y:2022:i:c:p:70-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.