IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Legal and regulatory issues regarding spectrum rights trading

Listed author(s):
  • Farquhar, Michele C.
  • Fitzgerald, Ari Q.
Registered author(s):

    The FCC's historic "command-and-control" approach to spectrum management has contributed to spectrum scarcity, especially as it relates to spectrum below 3Â GHz. This approach has also made it difficult for spectrum users to adjust their business plans to the needs of the marketplace. A more flexible regulatory regime would increase spectrum efficiency and foster innovation and new services. In order to promote more flexible use of spectrum, the authors recommend a number of regulatory and statutory changes, including (1) the elimination of use restrictions for new wireless allocations; (2) the replacement of existing use restrictions with power limits sufficient to minimize the potential for harmful interference; (3) the enactment of rules expressly allowing private parties to "contract around" established interference limits; and (4) the identification of "safe harbor" spectrum leasing arrangements that are deemed permissible under the FCC's license transfer of control requirements. The authors also recommend a number of statutory reforms, including granting the FCC express statutory authority to auction spectrum licenses held by private parties and assess spectrum fees upon users of auction-exempt spectrum.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Telecommunications Policy.

    Volume (Year): 27 (2003)
    Issue (Month): 7 (August)
    Pages: 527-532

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:27:y:2003:i:7:p:527-532
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:27:y:2003:i:7:p:527-532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.