IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v38y2014icp161-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating a taxonomic tool for technocracy and applying it to Silicon Valley

Author

Listed:
  • Sadowski, Jathan
  • Selinger, Evan

Abstract

Although much criticism has been leveled against technocracy, the multi-layered problem has been analyzed in piecemeal fashion and has yet to be subject to robust classification. Consequently, it can be difficult to determine when allegations of technocracy are true, and the extent to which new instances of technocracy perpetuate longstanding problems. To close this gap in scholarship, we have created a taxonomy of technocracy that identifies three things: 1) the central domains where technocracy emerges, 2) the basic means by which technocratic power is instantiated, and 3) the quintessential types of harms technocratic discipline engenders. To demonstrate the explanatory power of the taxonomy, we apply it to Silicon Valley and clarify how this contemporary example of technocracy relates to past instances.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadowski, Jathan & Selinger, Evan, 2014. "Creating a taxonomic tool for technocracy and applying it to Silicon Valley," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 161-168.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:38:y:2014:i:c:p:161-168
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X1400027X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dotson, Taylor, 2012. "Technology, choice and the good life: Questioning technological liberalism," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 326-336.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caprotti, Federico, 2016. "Defining a new sector in the green economy: Tracking the techno-cultural emergence of the cleantech sector, 1990–2010," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 80-89.
    2. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2020. "A shallow defence of a technocracy of artificial intelligence: Examining the political harms of algorithmic governance in the domain of government," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Gunderson, Ryan, 2016. "The sociology of technology before the turn to technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 40-48.
    4. Coeckelbergh, Mark & Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2023. "Climate change and the political pathways of AI: The technocracy-democracy dilemma in light of artificial intelligence and human agency," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    5. Kim, Eun-Sung, 2020. "Deep learning and principal–agent problems of algorithmic governance: The new materialism perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2019. "When nudge comes to shove: Liberty and nudging in the era of big data," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    2. Pütz, Fabian & Murphy, Finbarr & Mullins, Martin & O'Malley, Lisa, 2019. "Connected automated vehicles and insurance: Analysing future market-structure from a business ecosystem perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Oostveen, Anne-Marie & Lehtonen, Pinja, 2018. "The requirement of accessibility: European automated border control systems for persons with disabilities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 60-69.
    4. Ravanbakhsh, Rostam & Taqavi, Mostafa, 2020. "Muslim scholars and technological volition," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    5. Voinea, Cristina, 2018. "Designing for conviviality," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 70-78.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:38:y:2014:i:c:p:161-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.