IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v35y2013i1p14-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A decision framework for SME Information Technology (IT) managers: Factors for evaluating whether to outsource internal applications to Application Service Providers

Author

Listed:
  • Bayrak, Tuncay

Abstract

Businesses have been seeking new ways to improve their Information Technology that will better fit the company's needs with limited investment or even cost cutting. In order to achieve this many businesses have been turning toward Application Service Providers (ASPs). There are a number of factors supporting ASPs. ASP's can provide one service that connects multiple applications through one access point. The technology is very simple, straightforward, and easy to use for various businesses. There are also factors that do not favor ASPs, including service reliability, customization, integration, upgrades, and security issues. This study examines the paradigm shift from the traditional software model to the ASP model, and explores the favorable and unfavorable trends in ASPs. While the on-demand model seems to be a promising model for companies, there are certainly many decisions for a business to consider before making commitments to an ASP. Hence, this study aims to help IT managers evaluate each factor very carefully before outsourcing their internal applications to ASPs. It develops and provides a methodology for better IT decision-making with regard to ASPs which could be provided to other IT decisions as well. As “cloud” technologies, exemplified by ASPs, transform the world we live-in, better decision-making tools for small businesses will impact their success in the 21st century business world where SMEs can effectively compete with large businesses leveraging these services.

Suggested Citation

  • Bayrak, Tuncay, 2013. "A decision framework for SME Information Technology (IT) managers: Factors for evaluating whether to outsource internal applications to Application Service Providers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 14-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:35:y:2013:i:1:p:14-21
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2012.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X12000590
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2012.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goode, Sigi & Lin, Chinho & Fernandez, Walter & Jiang, James J., 2014. "Exploring two explanations of loyalty in application service provision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 649-657.
    2. Subramanian, Nachiappan & Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Zhou, Xiaolai, 2015. "Reprint of “Integration of logistics and cloud computing service providers: Cost and green benefits in the Chinese context”," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 81-93.
    3. Andra-Ileana Neicu & Anamaria-Cătălina Radu & Gheorghe Zaman & Ivona Stoica & Florian Răpan, 2020. "Cloud Computing Usage in SMEs. An Empirical Study Based on SMEs Employees Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Khayer, Abul & Talukder, Md. Shamim & Bao, Yukun & Hossain, Md. Nahin, 2020. "Cloud computing adoption and its impact on SMEs’ performance for cloud supported operations: A dual-stage analytical approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    5. Adjei, Joseph K. & Adams, Samuel & Mamattah, Lovestone, 2021. "Cloud computing adoption in Ghana; accounting for institutional factors," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    6. Curry, Michael & Marshall, Byron & Kawalek, Peter, 2014. "IT artifact bias: How exogenous predilections influence organizational information system paradigms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 427-436.
    7. Subramanian, Nachiappan & Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Zhou, Xiaolai, 2014. "Integration of logistics and cloud computing service providers: Cost and green benefits in the Chinese context," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 86-98.
    8. Rodríguez, Rocio & Svensson, Göran & Mehl, Erik Jens, 2020. "Digitalization process of complex B2B sales processes – Enablers and obstacles," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:35:y:2013:i:1:p:14-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.