IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v230y2026ics0040162526002155.html

Learning about unknowable tools: Bricolage in communities of practice for generative AI

Author

Listed:
  • da Silva, Ricardo Coelho
  • Rüling, Charles-Clemens
  • Duymedjian, Raffi
  • Zejnilovic, Leid

Abstract

Generative AI tools are unknowable, because their opacity, probabilistic outputs, and instability prevent knowing why specific outputs are produced, posing challenges for learning in communities of practice. This hinders expertise development and the creation of stable knowledge artifacts. We conducted a netnographic study of interactions in the OpenAI Developer Forum following the release of DALL-E 3 to investigate how communities of practice adapt to an unknowable tool. We find community participants remained in a state of “permanent experimentation”, enabling learning despite the absence of stable expertise. They deployed collective bricolage by gathering, sharing, and recombining examples to navigate the tool's unknowability. We contribute to communities of practice literature by showing collective learning is possible without stable expertise and extend bricolage research by positioning it as an epistemic practice suited to unknowable tools. These insights have implications for understanding learning and innovation in the context of fast-moving, opaque technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • da Silva, Ricardo Coelho & Rüling, Charles-Clemens & Duymedjian, Raffi & Zejnilovic, Leid, 2026. "Learning about unknowable tools: Bricolage in communities of practice for generative AI," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:230:y:2026:i:c:s0040162526002155
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162526002155
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:230:y:2026:i:c:s0040162526002155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.