IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v112y2016icp13-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The probability of discovery

Author

Listed:
  • De Roeck, Albert

Abstract

In 2009 the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) turned on and became the most complex scientific instrument ever put into operation by mankind. The LHC is what is called a “discovery machine”, meant to explore new limits at the high-energy frontier. Any cost–benefit analysis for such an instrument for fundamental research has to gauge the opportunities and risks of such a facility, and in particular major discoveries have a significant role in that balance. In this paper we discuss the challenges and uncertainties of discoveries in fundamental science, using the recent history and expected near future of the LHC as an example.

Suggested Citation

  • De Roeck, Albert, 2016. "The probability of discovery," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 13-19.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:112:y:2016:i:c:p:13-19
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516300427
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Coccia, Mario, 2022. "Probability of discoveries between research fields to explain scientific and technological change," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Mario Coccia, 2021. "Evolution and structure of research fields driven by crises and environmental threats: the COVID-19 research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(12), pages 9405-9429, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:112:y:2016:i:c:p:13-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.