IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v82y2012i2p357-359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sufficient statistic likelihood construction for age- and time-dependent multi-state joint recapture and recovery data

Author

Listed:
  • McCrea, R.S.

Abstract

Two closed-form likelihoods for multi-state joint recapture and recovery data were proposed in King and Brooks (2003); the first incorporated dependence on time and cohort whilst the second included dependence on age and cohort. However, when multi-state joint recapture and recovery data are modelled, it is likely that dependence on age and time will both be potentially of interest and therefore the most useful model formulation will incorporate both of these parameter structures. Within this article the likelihood function required for such a model is derived in terms of a set of sufficient statistics.

Suggested Citation

  • McCrea, R.S., 2012. "Sufficient statistic likelihood construction for age- and time-dependent multi-state joint recapture and recovery data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 357-359.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:82:y:2012:i:2:p:357-359
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2011.10.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715211003415
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2011.10.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. King, 2003. "Closed-form likelihoods for Arnason--Schwarz models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(2), pages 435-444, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José J. Lahoz-Monfort & Michael P. Harris & Sarah Wanless & Stephen N. Freeman & Byron J. T. Morgan, 2017. "Bringing It All Together: Multi-species Integrated Population Modelling of a Breeding Community," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(2), pages 140-160, June.
    2. Diana J. Cole, 2019. "Parameter redundancy and identifiability in hidden Markov models," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 77(2), pages 105-118, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blanca Sarzo & Ruth King & David Conesa & Jonas Hentati-Sundberg, 2021. "Correcting Bias in Survival Probabilities for Partially Monitored Populations via Integrated Models," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(2), pages 200-219, June.
    2. Diana J. Cole, 2019. "Parameter redundancy and identifiability in hidden Markov models," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 77(2), pages 105-118, August.
    3. S. A. Sisson & Y. Fan, 2009. "Towards automating model selection for a mark–recapture–recovery analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(2), pages 247-266, May.
    4. Rachel S. McCrea & Byron J. T. Morgan, 2011. "Multistate Mark–Recapture Model Selection Using Score Tests," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 234-241, March.
    5. Hannah Worthington & Rachel S. McCrea & Ruth King & Richard A. Griffiths, 2019. "Estimation of Population Size When Capture Probability Depends on Individual States," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(1), pages 154-172, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:82:y:2012:i:2:p:357-359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.