IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v79y2009i17p1833-1838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approximate subject-deletion influence diagnostics for Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighted (IPCW) method

Author

Listed:
  • Hattori, Satoshi
  • Kato, Mai

Abstract

An approximate formula for subject-deletion influence diagnostics is proposed for the Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighted method [Robins, J.M., Rotnitzky, A., Zhao, P., 1995. Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90, pp. 106-121] when the independent working correlation is employed. By a numerical study with a dataset from a clinical trial, it is found that the formula provides good approximation to the exact method by fitting regression models repeatedly to datasets without each subject and saves the computational time remarkably in particular for large datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Hattori, Satoshi & Kato, Mai, 2009. "Approximate subject-deletion influence diagnostics for Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighted (IPCW) method," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(17), pages 1833-1838, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:79:y:2009:i:17:p:1833-1838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(09)00189-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kang‐Mo Jung, 2008. "Local Influence in Generalized Estimating Equations," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 35(2), pages 286-294, June.
    2. Hongtu Zhu, 2004. "A diagnostic procedure based on local influence," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(3), pages 579-589, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vens, Maren & Ziegler, Andreas, 2012. "Generalized estimating equations and regression diagnostics for longitudinal controlled clinical trials: A case study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1232-1242.
    2. Chengcheng Hao & Dietrich Rosen & Tatjana Rosen, 2014. "Local Influence Analysis in AB–BA Crossover Designs," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(4), pages 1153-1166, December.
    3. V�ctor Leiva & Emilia Athayde & Cecilia Azevedo & Carolina Marchant, 2011. "Modeling wind energy flux by a Birnbaum--Saunders distribution with an unknown shift parameter," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(12), pages 2819-2838, February.
    4. Michelli Barros & Manuel Galea & Víctor Leiva & Manoel Santos-Neto, 2018. "Generalized Tobit models: diagnostics and application in econometrics," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 145-167, January.
    5. Elizabeth Hashimoto & Gauss Cordeiro & Edwin Ortega, 2013. "The new Neyman type A beta Weibull model with long-term survivors," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 933-954, June.
    6. Espinheira, Patri­cia L. & Ferrari, Silvia L.P. & Cribari-Neto, Francisco, 2008. "Influence diagnostics in beta regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(9), pages 4417-4431, May.
    7. Manghi, Roberto F. & Cysneiros, Francisco José A. & Paula, Gilberto A., 2019. "Generalized additive partial linear models for analyzing correlated data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 47-60.
    8. D. T. Nava & F. De Bastiani & M. A. Uribe-Opazo & O. Nicolis & M. Galea, 2017. "Local Influence for Spatially Correlated Binomial Data: An Application to the Spodoptera frugiperda Infestation in Corn," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(4), pages 540-561, December.
    9. Bao Yiqi & Cibele Maria Russo & Vicente G. Cancho & Francisco Louzada, 2016. "Influence diagnostics for the Weibull-Negative-Binomial regression model with cure rate under latent failure causes," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 1027-1060, May.
    10. Michelli Barros & Manuel Galea & Manuel González & Víctor Leiva, 2010. "Influence diagnostics in the tobit censored response model," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 19(3), pages 379-397, August.
    11. Mário Fernando De Sousa & Helton Saulo & Víctor Leiva & Paulo Scalco, 2018. "On Some Properties Of A New Asymmetry-Based Tobit Model," Anais do XLIV Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 44th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 129, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    12. Edwin M.M. Ortega & Gauss M. Cordeiro & Michael W. Kattan, 2012. "The negative binomial--beta Weibull regression model to predict the cure of prostate cancer," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(6), pages 1191-1210, November.
    13. Huang, Yufen & Kuo, Mei-Ling & Wang, Tai-Ho, 2007. "Pair-perturbation influence functions and local influence in PCA," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 5886-5899, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:79:y:2009:i:17:p:1833-1838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.