IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v204y2024ics0167715223001542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the uncertainty of partitions for infinite mixture models

Author

Listed:
  • Lavigne, Aurore
  • Liverani, Silvia

Abstract

Bayesian clustering models, such as Dirichlet process mixture models (DPMMs), are sophisticated flexible models. They induce a posterior distribution on the set of all partitions of a set of observations. Analysing this posterior distribution is of great interest, but it comes with several challenges. First of all, the number of partitions is overwhelmingly large even for moderate values of the number of observations. Consequently the sample space of the posterior distribution of the partitions is not explored well by MCMC samplers. Second, due to the complexity of representing the uncertainty of partitions, usually only maximum a posteriori estimates of the posterior distribution of partitions are provided and discussed in the literature. In this paper we propose a numerical and graphical method for quantifying the uncertainty of the clusters of a given partition of the data and we suggest how this tool can be used to learn about the partition uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Lavigne, Aurore & Liverani, Silvia, 2024. "Quantifying the uncertainty of partitions for infinite mixture models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:204:y:2024:i:c:s0167715223001542
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2023.109930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715223001542
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2023.109930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:204:y:2024:i:c:s0167715223001542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.