IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v121y2017icp1-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of pivotal sampling and unequal probability sampling with replacement

Author

Listed:
  • Chauvet, Guillaume
  • Ruiz-Gazen, Anne

Abstract

We prove that any implementation of pivotal sampling is more efficient than multinomial sampling. This yields the weak consistency of the Horvitz–Thompson estimator and the existence of a conservative variance estimator. A small simulation study supports our findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Chauvet, Guillaume & Ruiz-Gazen, Anne, 2017. "A comparison of pivotal sampling and unequal probability sampling with replacement," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-5.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:121:y:2017:i:c:p:1-5
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2016.09.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715216302024
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2016.09.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Michela Dickson & Yves Tillé, 2016. "Ordered spatial sampling by means of the traveling salesman problem," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1359-1372, December.
    2. Desislava Nedyalkova & Lionel Qualité & Yves Tillé, 2009. "General framework for the rotation of units in repeated survey sampling," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 63(3), pages 269-293, August.
    3. Anton Grafström & Niklas L. P. Lundström & Lina Schelin, 2012. "Spatially Balanced Sampling through the Pivotal Method," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 514-520, June.
    4. Lorenzo Fattorini & Piermaria Corona & Gherardo Chirici & Maria Chiara Pagliarella, 2015. "Design‐based strategies for sampling spatial units from regular grids with applications to forest surveys, land use, and land cover estimation," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 216-228, May.
    5. Roberto Benedetti & Federica Piersimoni & Paolo Postiglione, 2015. "Sampling Spatial Units for Agricultural Surveys," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-662-46008-5, Fall.
    6. Audrey‐Anne Vallée & Bastien Ferland‐Raymond & Louis‐Paul Rivest & Yves Tillé, 2015. "Incorporating spatial and operational constraints in the sampling designs for forest inventories," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(8), pages 557-570, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillaume Chauvet & Ronan Le Gleut, 2021. "Inference under pivotal sampling: Properties, variance estimation, and application to tesselation for spatial sampling," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(1), pages 108-131, March.
    2. Roberto Benedetti & Maria Michela Dickson & Giuseppe Espa & Francesco Pantalone & Federica Piersimoni, 2022. "A simulated annealing-based algorithm for selecting balanced samples," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 491-505, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillaume Chauvet & Ronan Le Gleut, 2021. "Inference under pivotal sampling: Properties, variance estimation, and application to tesselation for spatial sampling," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(1), pages 108-131, March.
    2. R. Benedetti & F. Piersimoni & P. Postiglione, 2017. "Alternative and complementary approaches to spatially balanced samples," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 75(3), pages 249-264, December.
    3. Raphaël Jauslin & Yves Tillé, 2020. "Spatial Spread Sampling Using Weakly Associated Vectors," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 431-451, September.
    4. Linda Altieri & Daniela Cocchi, 2021. "Spatial Sampling for Non‐compact Patterns," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(3), pages 532-549, December.
    5. Yves Tillé, 2022. "Some Solutions Inspired by Survey Sampling Theory to Build Effective Clinical Trials," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(3), pages 481-498, December.
    6. ak Tomasz B, 2021. "Spatial sampling methods modified by model use," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(2), pages 143-154, June.
    7. Tomasz Bąk, 2021. "Spatial sampling methods modified by model use," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(2), pages 143-154, June.
    8. Raphaël Jauslin & Bardia Panahbehagh & Yves Tillé, 2022. "Sequential spatially balanced sampling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(8), December.
    9. Huan Xie & Fang Wang & Yali Gong & Xiaohua Tong & Yanmin Jin & Ang Zhao & Chao Wei & Xinyi Zhang & Shicheng Liao, 2022. "Spatially Balanced Sampling for Validation of GlobeLand30 Using Landscape Pattern-Based Inclusion Probability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Sara Franceschi & Rosa Maria Di Biase & Agnese Marcelli & Lorenzo Fattorini, 2022. "Some Empirical Results on Nearest-Neighbour Pseudo-populations for Resampling from Spatial Populations," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-16, April.
    11. B. L. Robertson & O. Ozturk & O. Kravchuk & J. A. Brown, 2022. "Spatially Balanced Sampling with Local Ranking," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 622-639, December.
    12. Roberto Benedetti & Federica Piersimoni & Paolo Postiglione, 2017. "Spatially Balanced Sampling: A Review and A Reappraisal," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(3), pages 439-454, December.
    13. Zhonglei Wang & Zhengyuan Zhu, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Balanced Sampling Design for Longitudinal Area Surveys," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(2), pages 245-263, June.
    14. Lorenzo Fattorini & Timothy G. Gregoire & Sara Trentini, 2018. "The Use of Calibration Weighting for Variance Estimation Under Systematic Sampling: Applications to Forest Cover Assessment," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(3), pages 358-373, September.
    15. Xin Zhao & Anton Grafström, 2020. "A sample coordination method to monitor totals of environmental variables," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), September.
    16. Schelin, Lina & Sjöstedt-de Luna, Sara, 2014. "Spatial prediction in the presence of left-censoring," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 125-141.
    17. Robertson, B.L. & McDonald, T. & Price, C.J. & Brown, J.A., 2017. "A modification of balanced acceptance sampling," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 107-112.
    18. Giuseppe Espa & Diego Giuliani & Flavio Santi & Emanuele Taufer, 2017. "Model-based variance estimation in two-dimensional systematic sampling," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 75(3), pages 265-275, December.
    19. Matt Higham & Jay Ver Hoef & Lisa Madsen & Andy Aderman, 2021. "Adjusting a finite population block kriging estimator for imperfect detection," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), February.
    20. Lorenzo Fattorini & Alberto Meriggi & Enrico Merli & Paolo Varuzza, 2020. "Sampling Strategies to Estimate Deer Density by Drive Counts," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(2), pages 168-185, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:121:y:2017:i:c:p:1-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.