IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spapps/v162y2023icp361-386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Markov projection of semimartingales — Application to comparison results

Author

Listed:
  • Köpfer, Benedikt
  • Rüschendorf, Ludger

Abstract

In this paper we derive generalizations of comparison results for semimartingales. Our results are based on Markov projections and on known comparison results for Markov processes. The first part of the paper is concerned with an alternative method for the construction of Markov projections of semimartingales. In comparison to the construction in Bentata and Cont (2009) which is based on the solution of a well-posed martingale problem, we make essential use of pseudo-differential operators as investigated in Böttcher (2008) and of fundamental solutions of related evolution problems. This approach allows to dismiss with some boundedness assumptions on the differential characteristics in the martingale approach. As consequence of the construction of Markov projections, comparison results for path-independent functions (European options) of semimartingales can be reduced to the well investigated problem of comparison of Markovian semimartingales. The Markov projection approach to comparison results does not require one of the semimartingales to be Markovian, which is a common assumption in literature. An idea of Brunick and Shreve (2013) to mimick updated processes leads to a related reduction result to the Markovian case and thus to the comparison of related generators. As consequence, a general comparison result is also obtained for path-dependent functions of semimartingales.

Suggested Citation

  • Köpfer, Benedikt & Rüschendorf, Ludger, 2023. "Markov projection of semimartingales — Application to comparison results," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 361-386.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:162:y:2023:i:c:p:361-386
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2023.04.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304414923000923
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spa.2023.04.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amel Bentata & Rama Cont, 2015. "Forward equations for option prices in semimartingale models," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 617-651, July.
    2. Jan Bergenthum & Ludger Rüschendorf, 2006. "Comparison of Option Prices in Semimartingale Models," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 222-249, April.
    3. Neufeld, Ariel & Nutz, Marcel, 2014. "Measurability of semimartingale characteristics with respect to the probability law," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 124(11), pages 3819-3845.
    4. Ben Hambly & Matthieu Mariapragassam & Christoph Reisinger, 2014. "A Forward Equation for Barrier Options under the Brunick&Shreve Markovian Projection," Papers 1411.3618, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2016.
    5. Jan Bergenthum & Ludger Rüschendorf, 2006. "Comparison of Option Prices in Semimartingale Models," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 222-249, April.
    6. Ben Hambly & Matthieu Mariapragassam & Christoph Reisinger, 2016. "A forward equation for barrier options under the Brunick & Shreve Markovian projection," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 827-838, June.
    7. Forde, Martin, 2014. "On the Markovian projection in the Brunick–Shreve mimicking result," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 98-105.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiao, Huijie & Wu, Jiang-Lun, 2016. "Characterizing the path-independence of the Girsanov transformation for non-Lipschitz SDEs with jumps," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 326-333.
    2. Martin Tegn'er & Stephen Roberts, 2019. "A Probabilistic Approach to Nonparametric Local Volatility," Papers 1901.06021, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2019.
    3. Andrei Cozma & Christoph Reisinger, 2017. "Strong convergence rates for Euler approximations to a class of stochastic path-dependent volatility models," Papers 1706.07375, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2018.
    4. Fabio Bellini & Franco Pellerey & Carlo Sgarra & Salimeh Yasaei Sekeh, 2012. "Comparison results for Garch processes," Papers 1204.3786, arXiv.org.
    5. Jonas Al-Hadad & Zbigniew Palmowski, 2020. "Perpetual American options with asset-dependent discounting," Papers 2007.09419, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    6. Martin Tegner & Stephen Roberts, 2021. "A Bayesian take on option pricing with Gaussian processes," Papers 2112.03718, arXiv.org.
    7. Liu, Yating & Pagès, Gilles, 2022. "Monotone convex order for the McKean–Vlasov processes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 312-338.
    8. Alan Bain & Matthieu Mariapragassam & Christoph Reisinger, 2019. "Calibration of Local-Stochastic and Path-Dependent Volatility Models to Vanilla and No-Touch Options," Papers 1911.00877, arXiv.org.
    9. Romuald Élie & Emma Hubert & Thibaut Mastrolia & Dylan Possamaï, 2021. "Mean–field moral hazard for optimal energy demand response management," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 399-473, January.
    10. Keller, Christian, 2016. "Viscosity solutions of path-dependent integro-differential equations," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 126(9), pages 2665-2718.
    11. Nutz, Marcel, 2015. "Robust superhedging with jumps and diffusion," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 125(12), pages 4543-4555.
    12. Daniel Bartl & Michael Kupper & Ariel Neufeld, 2020. "Duality Theory for Robust Utility Maximisation," Papers 2007.08376, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    13. Daniel Bartl & Michael Kupper & Ariel Neufeld, 2020. "Pathwise superhedging on prediction sets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 215-248, January.
    14. Denk, Robert & Kupper, Michael & Nendel, Max, 2019. "A Semigroup Approach to Nonlinear Lévy Processes," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 610, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    15. Gaoyue Guo & Xiaolu Tan & Nizar Touzi, 2015. "Tightness and duality of martingale transport on the Skorokhod space," Papers 1507.01125, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2016.
    16. Romuald Elie & Emma Hubert & Thibaut Mastrolia & Dylan Possamai, 2019. "Mean-field moral hazard for optimal energy demand response management," Papers 1902.10405, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    17. Jakv{s}a Cvitani'c & Dylan Possamai & Nizar Touzi, 2014. "Moral Hazard in Dynamic Risk Management," Papers 1406.5852, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2015.
    18. Frank Bosserhoff & Mitja Stadje, 2019. "Robustness of Delta Hedging in a Jump-Diffusion Model," Papers 1910.08946, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    19. Peter K. Friz & Thomas Wagenhofer, 2023. "Reconstructing volatility: Pricing of index options under rough volatility," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 19-40, January.
    20. Bergenthum Jan & Rüschendorf Ludger, 2008. "Comparison results for path-dependent options," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 26(1), pages 53-72, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:162:y:2023:i:c:p:361-386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505572/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.