IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v70y2010i5p655-657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-rated health between psychology and biology. A response to Huisman and Deeg

Author

Listed:
  • Jylhä, Marja

Abstract

In their commentary on my article "What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model", Martin Huisman and Dorly Deeg argue, first, that the model I suggest may exaggerate the rational elements in the process of assessment and ignore the irrational and illogical influences; and, second, that self-rated health should be best understood not as a measure of "true health", but as a measure of people's perceptions about their health. My response to these comments attempts to clarify the nature of the model as a tool for describing the conceptual and logical structure of the evaluation, not the empirical process itself. Psychological and external influences, including "irrational" elements, can be understood as belonging to the contextual framework of evaluation. There is no question that self-rated health represents individual self-perceptions, but to explain its association with mortality it is crucial to understand its relationship to the biological and physiological states of the organism.

Suggested Citation

  • Jylhä, Marja, 2010. "Self-rated health between psychology and biology. A response to Huisman and Deeg," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 655-657, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:5:p:655-657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(09)00757-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Layes, Audrey & Asada, Yukiko & Kephart, George, 2012. "Whiners and deniers – What does self-rated health measure?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 1-9.
    2. Susan Caplan & Steven Buyske, 2015. "Depression, Help-Seeking and Self-Recognition of Depression among Dominican, Ecuadorian and Colombian Immigrant Primary Care Patients in the Northeastern United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:5:p:655-657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.