IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v70y2010i3p473-478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a longitudinal database of routinely recorded primary care consultations linked to service use and outcome data

Author

Listed:
  • Williams, Brian
  • Dowell, Jon
  • Humphris, Gerry
  • Themessl-Huber, Markus
  • Rushmer, Rosemary
  • Ricketts, Ian
  • Boyle, Paul
  • Sullivan, Frank

Abstract

The primary care consultation provides access to the majority of health care services and is central to obtaining diagnoses, treatment and ongoing management of long-term conditions. This paper reports the findings of an interdisciplinary feasibility study to explore the benefits and practical, technical and ethical challenges (and solutions) of creating a longitudinal database of recorded GP consultations in Tayside, Scotland which could be linked to existing routine data on intermediate and long-term health outcomes. After consultation we attempted to recruit and audio-record the consultations of all patients attending three general practices over a two week period. Background patient data, and patient and staff experiences of participation were also collected. Eventually, two practices participated with 77% of patients approached agreeing to participate. The findings suggest that the perceived integrity of the consultation was preserved. The overwhelming majority of patients believed that recording was worthwhile and did not feel it impacted on communication or the treatment they received; 93% indicated they would be willing to have subsequent consultations recorded and 81% would recommend participation to a friend. Staff had similar beliefs but raised concerns about potential increases in workload, confidentiality issues and ease of software use. We conclude that practice participation could be increased by providing safeguards on data use, financial reward, integrated recording software, and procedures to lessen the impact on workload. The resulting Scottish Clinical Interactions Project (SCIP) would provide the largest and most detailed longitudinal insight into real world medical consultations in the world, permitting the linking of consultation events and practices to subsequent outcomes and behaviours.

Suggested Citation

  • Williams, Brian & Dowell, Jon & Humphris, Gerry & Themessl-Huber, Markus & Rushmer, Rosemary & Ricketts, Ian & Boyle, Paul & Sullivan, Frank, 2010. "Developing a longitudinal database of routinely recorded primary care consultations linked to service use and outcome data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 473-478, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:3:p:473-478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(09)00701-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ring, Adele & Dowrick, Christopher F. & Humphris, Gerry M. & Davies, John & Salmon, Peter, 2005. "The somatising effect of clinical consultation: What patients and doctors say and do not say when patients present medically unexplained physical symptoms," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(7), pages 1505-1515, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clemente, Ignasi & Lee, Seung-Hee & Heritage, John, 2008. "Children in chronic pain: Promoting pediatric patients' symptom accounts in tertiary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(6), pages 1418-1428, March.
    2. Bauer, Amy M. & Chen, Chih-Nan & Alegría, Margarita, 2012. "Associations of physical symptoms with perceived need for and use of mental health services among Latino and Asian Americans," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(6), pages 1128-1133.
    3. Dan Guo & Maria Kleinstäuber & Malcolm Henry Johnson & Frederick Sundram, 2019. "Evaluating Commonalities Across Medically Unexplained Symptoms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-7, March.
    4. Rosie Webster & Andrew R Thompson & Paul Norman, 2015. "‘Everything's fine, so why does it happen?’ A qualitative investigation of patients' perceptions of noncardiac chest pain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1936-1945, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:3:p:473-478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.