IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v67y2008i3p453-462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reasons for disclosing depression matter: The consequences of having egosystem and ecosystem goals

Author

Listed:
  • Garcia, Julie A.
  • Crocker, Jennifer

Abstract

People with depression often conceal their depression and do not seek help, in part because of the stigma associated with mental illness. We propose two motivational systems for the self: egosystem motivations, concerned with protecting and inflating desired self-images, and ecosystem motivations, concerned with contributing or supporting others. Using a sample of 48 individuals at a Midwestern university, USA, this study examined motivations for disclosing or concealing a concealable stigma, to test the hypotheses that: (1) these motivations load on two factors corresponding to egosystem and ecosystem goals, and (2) ecosystem motivations for disclosure have more positive effects on disclosure and psychological well-being. We found that people with egosystem goals disclosed less, and also experienced lower psychological well-being when they did disclose. Conversely, people with ecosystem goals disclosed more and experienced greater psychological well-being while doing so. Implications of these findings for deciding when and to whom to disclose one's depression are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Garcia, Julie A. & Crocker, Jennifer, 2008. "Reasons for disclosing depression matter: The consequences of having egosystem and ecosystem goals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 453-462, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:67:y:2008:i:3:p:453-462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(08)00149-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abel, Gillian M., 2011. "Different stage, different performance: The protective strategy of role play on emotional health in sex work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1177-1184, April.
    2. Chaudoir, Stephenie R. & Fisher, Jeffrey D. & Simoni, Jane M., 2011. "Understanding HIV disclosure: A review and application of the Disclosure Processes Model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(10), pages 1618-1629, May.
    3. Der-Yan Han & Yi-Yin Lin & Shih-Cheng Liao & Ming-Been Lee & Graham Thornicroft & Chia-Yi Wu, 2015. "Analysis of the barriers of mental distress disclosure in medical inpatients in Taiwan," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 61(5), pages 446-455, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:67:y:2008:i:3:p:453-462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.