IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v65y2007i2p344-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anticipating ethical aspects of the use of biomarkers in the workplace: A tool for stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Caux, Chantal
  • Roy, David J.
  • Guilbert, Louise
  • Viau, Claude

Abstract

This research aimed to understand how occupational health stakeholders represented the various ethical concerns raised by the use of biomarkers of exposure, effects and susceptibility to harmful agents. These representations were investigated by seven homogeneous focus group interviews and an Internet discussion forum. The following stakeholders took part in this research: workers, physicians, nurses, researchers, employers, industrial hygienists, trade-union representatives and employees of the Quebec Board of Health and Safety in the Workplace. The data were analyzed qualitatively using a constant comparison technique. The main ethical problems raised by the stakeholders were organized around three emergent themes: a narrative of science, the validation of biomarkers and the protection of workers. From these themes emanate the principal ethical problems raised by the stakeholders: confidentiality, the interpretation of data, consent and information, as well as an advantages/disadvantages ratio. These problems are described as ethical tension zones. The analysis also takes into account the impact of the representations that each group of stakeholders has of each other and the ethical problems that can arise. Because it is drawn from a study of stakeholders' representations, the resulting analytical model might also be used to anticipate the root of ethical problems generated by the use of the biomarkers in an occupational health context.

Suggested Citation

  • Caux, Chantal & Roy, David J. & Guilbert, Louise & Viau, Claude, 2007. "Anticipating ethical aspects of the use of biomarkers in the workplace: A tool for stakeholders," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 344-354, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:65:y:2007:i:2:p:344-354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00170-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:65:y:2007:i:2:p:344-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.