IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v65y2007i11p2260-2271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Informed consent: Interpretations and practice on social surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Martin, Jean
  • Marker, David A.

Abstract

This paper discusses interpretations and practical requirements for fulfilling informed consent on social surveys, particularly in the health field, in order to achieve a balance between two competing principles: the public good of carrying out high-quality survey research which requires unbiased representative participation; and respect for individuals' rights to refuse to participate. It examines the appropriateness of different practical procedures aimed at getting agreement to voluntary participation consistent with the requirements of informed consent. It seeks to raise awareness of the principles and practicalities of carrying out social surveys in the health field, which can inform judgements of what is appropriate ethical practice, which in turn can inform judgements of ethical review committees.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin, Jean & Marker, David A., 2007. "Informed consent: Interpretations and practice on social surveys," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 2260-2271, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:65:y:2007:i:11:p:2260-2271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00440-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:65:y:2007:i:11:p:2260-2271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.