IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v62y2006i6p1330-1340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subverting the assembly-line: Childbirth in a free-standing birth centre

Author

Listed:
  • Walsh, Denis

Abstract

Across the world, concern is being expressed about the rising rates of birth interventions. As a result, there is growing interest in alternative organisational models of maternity care. Most of the research to date on these models has examined clinical outcomes. This paper, discussing key findings from an ethnographic study of a free-standing birth centre in the UK, explores organisational dimensions to care. It suggests that the advantages of scale have been under-recognised by policy makers to date. The birth centre displays organisational characteristics that contrast with the dominant Fordist/Taylorist model of large maternity units. These characteristics allow for greater temporal flexibility in labour care and tend to privilege relational, 'being' care over task-orientated, 'doing' care. In addition, features of a bureaucracy are much less in evidence, enabling entrepreneurial activity to flourish. There may be lessons here for other heath services as well as maternity services in optimising the advantages of small-scale provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Walsh, Denis, 2006. "Subverting the assembly-line: Childbirth in a free-standing birth centre," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 1330-1340, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:62:y:2006:i:6:p:1330-1340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00430-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, Brian & Crawford, Paul, 2003. "The clinical governance of the soul: 'deep management' and the self-regulating subject in integrated community mental health teams," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 67-81, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Finlay, Susanna & Sandall, Jane, 2009. ""Someone's rooting for you": Continuity, advocacy and street-level bureaucracy in UK maternal healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1228-1235, October.
    2. Overgaard, Charlotte & Fenger-Grøn, Morten & Sandall, Jane, 2012. "The impact of birthplace on women’s birth experiences and perceptions of care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(7), pages 973-981.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brownlie, Julie & Howson, Alexandra, 2006. "'Between the demands of truth and government': Health practitioners, trust and immunisation work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 433-443, January.
    2. Brown, Brian & Crawford, Paul & Nerlich, Brigitte & Koteyko, Nelya, 2008. "The habitus of hygiene: Discourses of cleanliness and infection control in nursing work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1047-1055, October.
    3. Glenda Riley, Robin & Manias, Elizabeth, 2006. "Governance in operating room nursing: Nurses' knowledge of individual surgeons," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 1541-1551, March.
    4. Finn, Rachael & Learmonth, Mark & Reedy, Patrick, 2010. "Some unintended effects of teamwork in healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1148-1154, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:62:y:2006:i:6:p:1330-1340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.