IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v61y2005i7p1495-1504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Essences and imperatives: An investigation of technology in childbirth

Author

Listed:
  • Kornelsen, Jude

Abstract

This paper explores the connection between our cultural inclination towards technology, the nature of technology itself, and birthing women's attitudes towards obstetrical technology using an analytical framework that includes literature on the philosophy of technology, as well as the sociology of childbirth. Data were gathered using a survey instrument and semi-structured interviews to contrast women's attitudes towards technology and experiences of childbirth in a large Canadian city: 25 women who planned a home birth assisted by a midwife and 25 low-risk women who planned a hospital birth. The results reveal that the total number of interventions the women experienced correlates in part to their attitudes towards technology: resistance to it on the part of home birthers and flexibility on the part of hospital birthers. Home birthers' resistance to technology stemmed from a consciousness of its overuse which blocks awareness of a sacred and authoritative "birthing force." Rather than rejecting technology, however, home birthers made conscious decisions about its appropriate use and relied upon access to a range of secondary technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kornelsen, Jude, 2005. "Essences and imperatives: An investigation of technology in childbirth," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(7), pages 1495-1504, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:61:y:2005:i:7:p:1495-1504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00102-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:61:y:2005:i:7:p:1495-1504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.