IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v58y2004i9p1635-1645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

'In this scenario, I do this, for these reasons': narrative, genre and ethical reasoning in the clinic

Author

Listed:
  • Jordens, Christopher F. C.
  • Little, Miles

Abstract

Narrative analysis has been applied by health researchers to investigate (among other things) clinical reasoning, clinical ethics and human identity. The term 'narrative' is often used as a broad category that covers a variety of spoken genres, however, and it thereby lacks delicacy as an analytic tool. We introduce genre theory, which enables us to differentiate more clearly between story genres and other spoken genres. We then apply the theory to ten narrative-style interviews with clinicians involved in the treatment and management of colorectal cancer in Sydney, Australia. We characterise the narrative-style interview as a macro-genre, and draw attention to the occurrence of spoken genres other than stories. We focus our analysis on a policy genre that occurred naturally and frequently in the spoken discourse of the informants, but which has not been described before in either the literature of social linguistics or the health and medical literature. We analyse two examples of this genre in detail in order to characterise its main semantic features, and differentiate it from story genres. We then discuss the genre with reference to Aristotelian interpretations of ethical reasoning in the clinic. We conclude that the policy genre is both the unfolding of practical wisdom in speech, and the appropriate choice of genre where a display of ethical identity is called for. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings for ongoing research, for ethics education, for bioethical theory, and for communication between some of the different stakeholder groups in clinical medicine.

Suggested Citation

  • Jordens, Christopher F. C. & Little, Miles, 2004. "'In this scenario, I do this, for these reasons': narrative, genre and ethical reasoning in the clinic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(9), pages 1635-1645, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:58:y:2004:i:9:p:1635-1645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(03)00370-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Little, Miles & Jordens, Christopher F.C. & McGrath, Catherine & Montgomery, Kathleen & Kerridge, Ian & Carter, Stacy M., 2007. "Pragmatic pluralism: Mutual tolerance of contested understandings between orthodox and alternative practitioners in autologous stem cell transplantation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 1512-1523, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:58:y:2004:i:9:p:1635-1645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.