IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v58y2004i5p887-897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The good, the bad, and the unresolved death in Kaliai

Author

Listed:
  • Counts, Dorothy Ayers
  • Counts, David

Abstract

Lusi-Kaliai speakers in West New Britain, Papua New Guinea consider death to be either good or bad depending on whether it is the consequence of bad social relationships and causes social upheaval. A good death is under the control of the dying person and is the result of the natural process of aging. Good deaths are the ideal, but are rare in Kaliai. Bad death is more common and implies a rupture of social relations and results in the destruction of peace and social order. A death may be unresolved because people disagree as to its cause and its meaning for others. Strife resulting from an unresolved death may be irreparable, making closure impossible. The resulting social dysfunction can lead to further death and the breakdown of the community. However, when people understand the cause of death and can identify the causative agent, it is possible to resolve the problems leading to the death and restore order. Case studies illustrate how particular deaths fit these categories and how the people of Kaliai struggle to explain death, to cope with its inevitability, and to repair the social disruption in its wake.

Suggested Citation

  • Counts, Dorothy Ayers & Counts, David, 2004. "The good, the bad, and the unresolved death in Kaliai," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 887-897, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:58:y:2004:i:5:p:887-897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(03)00579-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:58:y:2004:i:5:p:887-897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.