IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v58y2004i11p2279-2289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choosing where to deliver: decision criteria among women with low-risk pregnancies in France

Author

Listed:
  • Combier, E.
  • Zeitlin, J.
  • de Courcel, N.
  • Vasseur, S.
  • Lalouf, A.
  • Amat-Roze, J. M.
  • de Pouvourville, G.

Abstract

As in the rest of Europe, the supply of maternity hospitals has progressively decreased over the past few decades in France. An understanding of user choice criteria is important to help health planners reorganize obstetrical services and to predict changes in utilization patterns in response to supply changes. The objectives were to understand the criteria that women use to select their maternity hospital in France and to analyse the relation to individual and community characteristics. A survey of 536 recently delivered women with low-risk pregnancies explored the factors motivating user choice in three territories with distinct geographical and health service supply characteristics: four districts in Burgundy, two districts in Pays de la Loire, and the district of Seine-Saint-Denis in Ile-de-France. Women were asked to select a principal choice criterion. Their responses were grouped into categories: Accessibility/proximity, reputation of the establishment among users, advice of treating physician, technical quality and cost. Accessibility and proximity were the most selected criteria (33%), followed by the reputation of the maternity (29%), technical quality (15%) and advice of treating physician (13%). Age, parity and education influenced choice criteria. After controlling for individual determinants, region of residence was highly related to choice criteria; women living in Burgundy were more likely to select an establishment based on proximity, in Seine-Saint-Denis women were more likely to follow the advice of their physician, and in Pays de la Loire, more likely to base their decisions on the reputation of the establishment. The association between choice criteria and community characteristics could explain the failure of previous models to predict behaviour in different contexts. It is important to carry out local surveys of user perceptions before restructuring in order to take into consideration women's opinions on their future places of delivery and to refine geographic models.

Suggested Citation

  • Combier, E. & Zeitlin, J. & de Courcel, N. & Vasseur, S. & Lalouf, A. & Amat-Roze, J. M. & de Pouvourville, G., 2004. "Choosing where to deliver: decision criteria among women with low-risk pregnancies in France," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(11), pages 2279-2289, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:58:y:2004:i:11:p:2279-2289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(03)00432-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lila C. Fleming & Rashid Ansumana & Alfred S. Bockarie & Joel D. Alejandre & Karen K. Owen & Umaru Bangura & David H. Jimmy & Kevin M. Curtin & David A. Stenger & Kathryn H. Jacobsen, 2016. "Health-care availability, preference, and distance for women in urban Bo, Sierra Leone," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 61(9), pages 1079-1088, December.
    2. Pilkington, Hugo & Blondel, Béatrice & Carayol, Marion & Breart, Gérard & Zeitlin, Jennifer, 2008. "Impact of maternity unit closures on access to obstetrical care: The French experience between 1998 and 2003," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(10), pages 1521-1529, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:58:y:2004:i:11:p:2279-2289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.