IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v57y2003i9p1735-1745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is 'normal' about women's (hetero)sexual desire and orgasm?: a report of an in-depth interview study

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolson, Paula
  • Burr, Jennifer

Abstract

This paper challenges the rapidly re-emerging medicalised model of women's sexual problems, or female sexual dysfunction, particularly those concerned with problems of orgasm. It reports a qualitative in-depth interview study of 33 women between the ages of 19 and 60 years (mean age 28.6 years) where the data analysis particularly focused upon their subjective perceptions of what constituted 'normal' sexual satisfaction for themselves and other women. The data comprised taped interviews which were fully transcribed and analysed using an interpretive framework based on both symbolic interactionist and psychodynamic concepts. The results indicated that these women's desires and expectations differed appreciably from those reported in the typical clinical and sexological literature. Women interviewed here seemed less concerned with achieving orgasm through heterosexual intercourse for themselves than the literature suggested they might be. There was however, evidence of a strong desire to experience orgasm in this way for the sake of their male partners. Thus, it is suggested that there is probably a closer relationship between popular beliefs about what is 'normal' based upon the medical model with women placing themselves in a dysfunctional category, than there is between the everyday enjoyment of sex and women identifying themselves as being sexually healthy.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolson, Paula & Burr, Jennifer, 2003. "What is 'normal' about women's (hetero)sexual desire and orgasm?: a report of an in-depth interview study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(9), pages 1735-1745, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:57:y:2003:i:9:p:1735-1745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(03)00012-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:57:y:2003:i:9:p:1735-1745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.