IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v56y2003i6p1249-1260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motherhood as a vulnerability factor in major depression: the role of negative pregnancy experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Bernazzani, Odette
  • Bifulco, Antonia

Abstract

Adverse pregnancy experiences were examined retrospectively in relation to adult lifetime experience of clinical depression to see whether such experience conferred long-term risk for women. The sample consisted of just under 200 community-based women, half of whom were selected for high depressive-risk on the basis of adverse childhood experience. Over two-thirds of these women had experienced pregnancy. Adverse pregnancies were classified either in terms of loss (adverse non-live pregnancy/births) or in terms of live births in difficult circumstances (adverse live pregnancy/births). Intensive life history interviews collected details of all pregnancies, childhood neglect/abuse, marital adversity and a history of episodes of clinical depression. Both adverse non-live and live pregnancy experiences were significantly related to lifetime depression. The relationship remained for depression in different time periods and for those episodes unrelated to maternity experience. Both types of adverse pregnancy/birth experiences were associated with increased rates of marital problems. While adverse live pregnancy/births related to prior childhood neglect/abuse, this did not hold for those non-live. Logistic regression showed that only adverse non-live pregnancy/births together with marital adversity and childhood neglect/abuse provided the best model for lifetime depression. The findings are discussed in terms of lifetime trajectories linking difficult environments, close relationships and issues of loss.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernazzani, Odette & Bifulco, Antonia, 2003. "Motherhood as a vulnerability factor in major depression: the role of negative pregnancy experiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1249-1260, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:6:p:1249-1260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(02)00123-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:6:p:1249-1260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.