IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Motherhood as a vulnerability factor in major depression: the role of negative pregnancy experiences

Listed author(s):
  • Bernazzani, Odette
  • Bifulco, Antonia
Registered author(s):

    Adverse pregnancy experiences were examined retrospectively in relation to adult lifetime experience of clinical depression to see whether such experience conferred long-term risk for women. The sample consisted of just under 200 community-based women, half of whom were selected for high depressive-risk on the basis of adverse childhood experience. Over two-thirds of these women had experienced pregnancy. Adverse pregnancies were classified either in terms of loss (adverse non-live pregnancy/births) or in terms of live births in difficult circumstances (adverse live pregnancy/births). Intensive life history interviews collected details of all pregnancies, childhood neglect/abuse, marital adversity and a history of episodes of clinical depression. Both adverse non-live and live pregnancy experiences were significantly related to lifetime depression. The relationship remained for depression in different time periods and for those episodes unrelated to maternity experience. Both types of adverse pregnancy/birth experiences were associated with increased rates of marital problems. While adverse live pregnancy/births related to prior childhood neglect/abuse, this did not hold for those non-live. Logistic regression showed that only adverse non-live pregnancy/births together with marital adversity and childhood neglect/abuse provided the best model for lifetime depression. The findings are discussed in terms of lifetime trajectories linking difficult environments, close relationships and issues of loss.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

    Volume (Year): 56 (2003)
    Issue (Month): 6 (March)
    Pages: 1249-1260

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:6:p:1249-1260
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:6:p:1249-1260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.