IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v56y2003i2p235-245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding lesbians' healthcare behaviour: the case of breast self-examination

Author

Listed:
  • Fish, J.
  • Wilkinson, S.

Abstract

Lesbians' risk of breast cancer is a much-debated issue in health research because lesbians are believed to be at higher risk of the disease than are heterosexual women. This belief is based upon particular risk factors for breast cancer, which are said to be more prevalent in lesbians; and upon differences in preventive health behaviours: in particular, lesbians are said to be less likely to practise breast self-examination (BSE). This paper presents data collected as part of the UK Lesbians and Healthcare Survey (n=1066) focusing on lesbians who report never practising BSE (n=218, 20%) and the explanations they offer for their healthcare behaviours. It identifies six types of explanation for not practising BSE: (i) "I don't know what I'm looking for"; (ii) "I've never got into the habit"; (iii) "I'm frightened in case I find something"; (iv) "I don't think I'm at much risk"; (v) "I'm uncomfortable with my body"; and (vi) "My partner does it for me". These findings are important for increasing understanding of lesbians' healthcare behaviour and for developing health promotion materials relevant to their needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Fish, J. & Wilkinson, S., 2003. "Understanding lesbians' healthcare behaviour: the case of breast self-examination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 235-245, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:2:p:235-245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(02)00022-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:2:p:235-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.