IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Politics of leprosy segregation in Japan: the emergence, transformation and abolition of the patient segregation policy

Listed author(s):
  • Sato, Hajime
  • Narita, Minoru
Registered author(s):

    The segregation of leprosy patients, a practice introduced early in the 20th century, was maintained in Japan after World War II. It locked in the viability of subsequent policy choices, and patients' isolation was sustained long after it was proven to be scientifically unnecessary. For leprologists and leprosarium directors, there was little opportunity to conceptualize and test the epidemiological validity and effectiveness of outpatient services as alternatives to the existing policy, since most of the patients were already hospitalized. Since leprosy was no longer a threat to the general public, bureaucratic officials, as well as legislators, lacked strong incentives to reformulate the overall policy. Within the Ministry of Health and Welfare, daily tasks were largely transferred to the section for leprosarium management, and the search for other options lost importance. For patients, long institutionalization elevated their dependency on life in leprosaria. These conditions must be emphasized as policy legacies, the results of past policies, since they posed obstacles to effective policy innovation in accordance with changing scientific knowledge. To make policies reflective of scientific knowledge, it is essential to understand and foresee the effect of policy legacy, when introducing and appraising public health policies.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

    Volume (Year): 56 (2003)
    Issue (Month): 12 (June)
    Pages: 2529-2539

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:12:p:2529-2539
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:12:p:2529-2539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.