IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v54y2002i3p399-409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The doctor as God's mechanic? Beliefs in the Southeastern United States

Author

Listed:
  • Mansfield, Christopher J.
  • Mitchell, Jim
  • King, Dana E.

Abstract

Spiritual practice and beliefs related to healing are described using data from a telephone survey. Questions in the survey address the practice of prayer and spiritual beliefs related to healing. Questions explore belief in miracles, that God acts through religious healers, the importance of God's will in healing, and that God acts through physicians. Questions also ask whether people discuss spiritual concerns with their physician and whether they would want to if seriously ill. We create a composite index to compare religious faith in healing across race, gender, education, income denomination, and health status. Logistic regression predicts types of patients who believe God acts through physicians and those inclined to discuss spiritual concerns when ill. The most important findings are that: 80% of respondents believe God acts through physicians to cure illness, 40% believe God's will is the most important factor in recovery, and spiritual faith in healing is stronger among women, African-Americans, Evangelical Protestants, the poorer, sicker, and less educated. Those who believe that God acts through physicians are more likely to be African-American than White (OR=1.9) and 55 or older (OR=3.5). Those who discuss spiritual concerns with a physician are more likely to be female (OR=1.9) and in poor health (OR=2.1). Although 69% say they would want to speak to someone about spiritual concerns if seriously ill, only 3% would choose to speak to a physician. We conclude that religious faith in healing is prevalent and strong in the southern United States and that most people believe that God acts through doctors. Knowledge of the phenomena and variation across the population can guide inquiry into the spiritual concerns of patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Mansfield, Christopher J. & Mitchell, Jim & King, Dana E., 2002. "The doctor as God's mechanic? Beliefs in the Southeastern United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 399-409, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:54:y:2002:i:3:p:399-409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(01)00038-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamed Omar Salem & Bader Saleh & Said Yousef & Sufyan Sabri, 2009. "Help-Seeking Behaviour of Patients Attending the Psychiatric Service in a Sample of United Arab Emirates Population," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 55(2), pages 141-148, March.
    2. Chyong-ling Lin & Jin-Tsann Yeh, 2013. "Modeling religious involvement: a qualitative integration based on female role visualization consumption," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 561-566, January.
    3. Calvin Moorley & Sharon Cahill & Nova Corcoran, 2016. "Stroke among African‐Caribbean women: lay beliefs of risks and causes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3-4), pages 403-411, February.
    4. Cadge, Wendy & Griera, Mar & Lucken, Kristen & Michalowski, Ines, 2017. "Religion in Public Institutions: Comparative Perspectives from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 56(2), pages 226-233.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:54:y:2002:i:3:p:399-409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.