IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v53y2001i5p657-667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male physicians' narratives about being in ethically difficult care situations in paediatrics

Author

Listed:
  • V, Sørlie
  • Førde, R.
  • Lindseth, A.
  • Norberg, A.

Abstract

This study is a part of a comprehensive investigation into the narratives of male and female physicians and nurses concerning their experience of being in ethically difficult care situations in paediatrics. Seventeen male physicians with a range of levels of expertise, working on various wards in paediatric clinics at two university hospitals in Norway, narrated 78 stories. The transcribed interview texts were subjected to hermeneutic analysis. All the interviewees related problems in both an action and a relation ethics perspective. The main focus was on ethical problems concerning life and death decisions. The central theme was overtreatment, which they felt they could easily slip into because of a lack of exact knowledge about the outcome of life-saving treatment. The less experienced physicians required criteria and ethical guidelines that could tell them when to stop treatment, and they expected the more experienced physicians to be able to teach them about such things. The more experienced physicians, however, told a different story about life-saving practices in paediatrics. They spoke of a very demanding life situation. In such a situation communication seems decisive, not only to clarify treatment questions, but primarily to cope with life. The physicians' main concern seemed to be the parents rather than the children. Both groups underlined the importance of professional distance to patients and to ethical problems.

Suggested Citation

  • V, Sørlie & Førde, R. & Lindseth, A. & Norberg, A., 2001. "Male physicians' narratives about being in ethically difficult care situations in paediatrics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 657-667, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:53:y:2001:i:5:p:657-667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(00)00368-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:53:y:2001:i:5:p:657-667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.