IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v53y2001i11p1503-1511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spirituality and well-being: an exploratory study of the patient perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Daaleman, Timothy P.
  • Cobb, Ann Kuckelman
  • Frey, Bruce B.

Abstract

Spirituality has become a construct of interest in American health care; however, there remains a limited understanding of how patients themselves describe spirituality and view its impact on their health and well-being. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe elements of patient-reported, health-related spirituality. A qualitative study utilized focus group interviews of 17 women with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 18 women with no self-identified illness. Purposeful sampling of participants who had prior experiences in healthcare settings, with or without a chronic illness, guided the sampling strategy. Editing analysis of the interview transcripts were coded into conceptual categories. Participant narratives were grouped into eight general categories: (1) change in functional status, (2) core beliefs, (3) medical/disease state information gathering and processing, (4) interpretation and understanding, (5) life scheme, (6) positive intentionality, (7) agency, and (8) subjective well-being. A change in functional status was the catalyst for two process-oriented categories; medical/disease state information gathering and processing, and the higher-order interpretation and understanding, or meaning making of life events. Core beliefs were sources that grounded and maintained an interpretative structure through which participants viewed their life events and positively framed their experiences. Life scheme described a heuristic framework through which all life events were viewed. Positive intentionality was participant belief in the capacity to execute a specific action that was required for a desired outcome. Participants tied the attitudes and practices of positive intentionality with agency, or the use or exertion of power through belief, practice, or community. Participants outlined both a positive affective and cognitive component of subjective well-being. Patients describe several interrelated elements and a process of events in their depiction of spirituality in healthcare settings. Patient-reported spirituality is predominantly a cognitive construct incorporating the domains of life scheme and positive intentionality.

Suggested Citation

  • Daaleman, Timothy P. & Cobb, Ann Kuckelman & Frey, Bruce B., 2001. "Spirituality and well-being: an exploratory study of the patient perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(11), pages 1503-1511, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:53:y:2001:i:11:p:1503-1511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(00)00439-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Razieh Parniyan & Abdoreza Kazemiane & Marzieh Jahromi & Farzad Poorgholami, 2016. "A Study of the Correlation between Religious Attitudes and Quality Of Life in Students at Jahrom University of Medical Sciences in 2014," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(10), pages 1-43, October.
    2. Fatemeh Merati Fashi & Behnam Khaledi-Paveh & Rostam Jalali & Amir Hossein Hashemian, 2017. "Relationship between Spiritual Intelligence and Self-Care of Hemodialysis Patients," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Abbas Shamsalinia & Tayebe Pourghaznein & Marzie Parsa, 2016. "The Relationship Between Hope and Religious Coping Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 208-208, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:53:y:2001:i:11:p:1503-1511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.