IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v52y2001i1p45-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health implications of early childbearing on pregnancy outcome in Botswana: insights from the institutional records

Author

Listed:
  • Letamo, Gobopamang
  • Majelantle, Rolang G.

Abstract

Early childbearing can have deleterious effects on pregnancy outcome. This study in Botswana found that both birth injuries and congenital abnormalities were common among infants born to teenage mothers compared to infants of women aged 20-34 years. This statistically significant relationship disappeared, however, when controls were introduced. Based on the results of this study, it appears that in order to improve pregnancy outcomes, frequent and early prenatal visits and improvements in the socioeconomic environment are needed. Thus, postponement of childbearing beyond teenage years alone would not necessarily improve pregnancy outcomes in Botswana.

Suggested Citation

  • Letamo, Gobopamang & Majelantle, Rolang G., 2001. "Health implications of early childbearing on pregnancy outcome in Botswana: insights from the institutional records," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 45-52, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:52:y:2001:i:1:p:45-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(00)00121-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristine Husøy Onarheim & Johanne Helene Iversen & David E Bloom, 2016. "Economic Benefits of Investing in Women’s Health: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:52:y:2001:i:1:p:45-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.