IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v51y2000i2p175-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pain response in Chinese and non-Chinese Canadian infants: is there a difference?

Author

Listed:
  • Rosmus, Christina
  • Johnston, C. Céleste
  • Chan-Yip, Alice
  • Yang, Fang

Abstract

This study was designed to compare the behavioural pain responses of 2-month-old Canadian-born Chinese babies receiving a routine immunization to those of non-Chinese infants in similar situations. Two groups of 26 infants were obtained from a pediatric clinic held by a Chinese pediatrician and a suburban pediatric practice of a large Canadian city. Facial expression using the Neonatal Facial Coding System (Grunau, R.V.E., Craig, K.D., 1987. Pain expression in neonates: facial action and cry. Pain, 28, 395-410.) and cry using the Fast Fourier Transform were measured during 30 s following the insertion of the needle. Acculturation in Chinese mothers, circadian rhythm, gender, height and weight in infants were assessed. Multivariate analysis of variance revealed significant differences in pain response between these two groups with the Chinese babies showing greater response. No significant effect of circadian rhythm and gender was identified. These results suggest the presence of differences in acute pain response in relation to culture by at least 2 months of age.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosmus, Christina & Johnston, C. Céleste & Chan-Yip, Alice & Yang, Fang, 2000. "Pain response in Chinese and non-Chinese Canadian infants: is there a difference?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 175-184, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:51:y:2000:i:2:p:175-184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00447-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:51:y:2000:i:2:p:175-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.