Socioeconomic status and infant mortality in Australia: a national study of small urban areas, 1985-89
This study uses small-area data for the period 1985-89 to examine the relationship between socioeconomic status and infant mortality in each of the mainland State capital cities of Australia. An unweighted OLS regression analysis based on 195 Statistical Local Areas (SLAs) that recorded five or more deaths over the reference period shows that standardised infant mortality ratios were significantly higher in areas with greater concentrations of low income families. This relationship was independent of the effects of low birthweight, Aboriginality, ethnicity and variability between each of the capital cities. To test for the robustness of this result a sensitivity analysis was undertaken. This involved (a) performing a Principal Components Analysis on a wide range of sociodemographic variables to derive factor scales that were subsequently included in a regression analysis, (b) using weighted least-squares regression and a Poisson generalised linear model and (c) including in the analysis all SLAs irrespective of the number of infant deaths. The sensitivity analysis supported the results of this study, thus validating the observed association between the socioeconomic characteristics of urban areas and their rate of infant mortality. Despite marked reductions in overall rates of infant mortality over the last century in Australia, socioeconomic disparities were still evident during the mid-to-late 1980s. Whether and to what extent this situation persisted during the early-to-mid 1990s will be known in the near future when the next collection of area-based data are publicly released. The results of this study, therefore, represent an important baseline against which more contemporary national trends can be monitored.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 50 (2000)
Issue (Month): 9 (May)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description|
|Order Information:|| Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:9:p:1209-1225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.