IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v50y2000i11p1679-1693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marginal impact of psychosocial factors on multimorbidity: results of an explorative nested case-control study

Author

Listed:
  • van den Akker, Marjan
  • Buntinx, Frank
  • Metsemakers, Job F. M.
  • Knottnerus, J. André

Abstract

This study examines differences between subjects with zero, one or two or more new diseases in a period of three years, with regard to demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, life style, medical family history and current diseases in the family, psychological and sociological characteristics. This was studied using a primary care based nested case-control study. Data were available from 3745 cases and controls, all aged 20 years and older. All subjects were sampled from the Registration Network Family Practices, which is a computerised continuous primary care database. Cases were defined as subjects with new multimorbidity (two or more new diseases) registered in a period of three years and two groups of controls were operationalised as subjects with either one or no new diseases registered in the same period. Determinants were assessed by means of a postal questionnaire. Increasing age, higher number of previous diseases and low socioeconomic status were strongly associated with both morbidity and multimorbidity. After adjustment for these basic variables, the occurrence of multimorbidity was more frequent among subjects who did not report (volunteer) work or study, who had an active coping style, a high occupational class and an external locus of control. Profiles for subjects at risk for morbidity and multimorbidity seem to differ.

Suggested Citation

  • van den Akker, Marjan & Buntinx, Frank & Metsemakers, Job F. M. & Knottnerus, J. André, 2000. "Marginal impact of psychosocial factors on multimorbidity: results of an explorative nested case-control study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(11), pages 1679-1693, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:11:p:1679-1693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00408-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:11:p:1679-1693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.