IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community-perceived benefits of ivermectin treatment in Northeastern Nigeria


  • Akogun, O. B.
  • Akogun, M. K.
  • Audu, Z.


A 3-step approach involving focus group discussion, structured interviews and informal conversations with key individuals was used to investigate community usage and perceived benefits of ivermectin in nine Nigerian villages participating in a WHO-sponsored investigation of community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI). Only 27% of 284 persons interviewed had received treatment. An under-estimation of the district's ivermectin needs led to inadequate supply of ivermectin to the communities, which was cited as the main reason (65%) for non-treatment. All those treated (N=76) were further interviewed using questionnaires. Worm expulsion (80%) and blindness prevention (68%) were the most frequently stated benefits. Other perceived benefits were an increase in vitality (68%), sexual drive and performance (29%). The sudden relief from a heavy burden of worms, which had built up over a long period, may have indirect effect on all aspects of an individual's health and account for the diverse experiences. The feeling of vitality, good appetite and general health following ivermectin treatment is an animating experience to many communities. Health planners face the challenge of preparing communities for fewer 'sensational' experiences and preventing a possible feeling of disappointment that may result from frequent usage.

Suggested Citation

  • Akogun, O. B. & Akogun, M. K. & Audu, Z., 2000. "Community-perceived benefits of ivermectin treatment in Northeastern Nigeria," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(10), pages 1451-1456, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:10:p:1451-1456

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:10:p:1451-1456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.