IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v49y1999i5p567-580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two good reasons: women's and men's perspectives on dual contraceptive use

Author

Listed:
  • Woodsong, Cynthia
  • Koo, Helen P.

Abstract

In the US, continued high rates of unintended pregnancy, combined with increases in heterosexual transmission of HIV to women, have sharply magnified concern about the factors leading to or barring the use of contraceptive methods to protect concurrently against both risks. This paper reports on results of focus group research among African-American women participating in a longitudinal study and African-American men who are either partners of the women or are of similar socio-economic status as their partners. We found a high level of agreement between men and women on the issues and problems that both sexes face. People felt that regardless of a woman's use of other contraceptive methods, a condom should always be used for protection. This belief, however, differed markedly from actual practice. Although we attempted to discern the relative salience of concern about pregnancy versus STIs, we conclude that people may not separate these two concerns in their resolve to use two methods. Furthermore, they recognized the need for dual protection, but expected conflict with their partners from using condoms as a second method because of high levels of distrust regarding sexual fidelity. Thus people are caught in a bind: distrust further increases the sense of a need for dual methods, but using condoms exacerbates the problems people have with achieving trust in relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Woodsong, Cynthia & Koo, Helen P., 1999. "Two good reasons: women's and men's perspectives on dual contraceptive use," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(5), pages 567-580, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:5:p:567-580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00060-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hodaka Kosugi & Akira Shibanuma & Junko Kiriya & Ken Ing Cherng Ong & Stephen Mucunguzi & Conrad Muzoora & Masamine Jimba, 2020. "Positive Deviance for Dual-Method Promotion among Women in Uganda: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:5:p:567-580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.