IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v49y1999i4p449-457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient assertiveness and physician decision-making among older breast cancer patients

Author

Listed:
  • Krupat, Edward
  • Irish, Julie T.
  • Kasten, Linda E.
  • Freund, Karen M.
  • Burns, Risa B.
  • Moskowitz, Mark A.
  • McKinlay, John B.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether assertive patient behavior influences physician decision-making in the treatment of older breast cancer patients. One hundred and twenty-eight physicians saw videotapes depicting women seeking care for breast cancer and then recommended evaluation and treatment plans. Identical scripts were used, but the age, race, socioeconomic status, mobility, general health, and assertive behavior of the patients were experimentally varied along with the physician's specialty and length of practice. No direct effects of assertive patient behavior were seen. However, black, comorbid, and lower SES women were more likely to have full staging of their tumors ordered when they made an assertive request. Treatment recommendations also showed an interaction of assertiveness with patient's age and social class as well as physicians' specialty. The results indicate that a moderately assertive patient request may change provider behavior, although the effects of assertiveness vary most by what type of patient demonstrates this behavior. In particular, assertiveness led to more careful diagnostic testing for patients who came from groups that are "disadvantaged."

Suggested Citation

  • Krupat, Edward & Irish, Julie T. & Kasten, Linda E. & Freund, Karen M. & Burns, Risa B. & Moskowitz, Mark A. & McKinlay, John B., 1999. "Patient assertiveness and physician decision-making among older breast cancer patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 449-457, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:4:p:449-457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00106-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malat, Jennifer R. & van Ryn, Michelle & Purcell, David, 2006. "Race, socioeconomic status, and the perceived importance of positive self-presentation in health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2479-2488, May.
    2. Gordon, Howard S. & Street, Richard Jr. & Adam Kelly, P. & Souchek, Julianne & Wray, Nelda P., 2005. "Physician-patient communication following invasive procedures: an analysis of post-angiogram consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 1015-1025, September.
    3. Burgess, Diana Jill & Crowley-Matoka, Megan & Phelan, Sean & Dovidio, John F. & Kerns, Robert & Roth, Craig & Saha, Somnath & van Ryn, Michelle, 2008. "Patient race and physicians' decisions to prescribe opioids for chronic low back pain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 1852-1860, December.
    4. Street Jr., Richard L. & Gordon, Howard & Haidet, Paul, 2007. "Physicians' communication and perceptions of patients: Is it how they look, how they talk, or is it just the doctor?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 586-598, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:4:p:449-457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.