IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v48y1999i5p647-660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value added to health by pharmacists

Author

Listed:
  • Indritz, Mary E. S.
  • Artz, Margaret B.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to discover to whom the pharmacy profession adds value and how it describes and documents that value, to inform other health care professionals of that value, and to present a method of review. Definitions of 'values' and 'value' were used to develop this methodology. Three ranking terms (benefit, demand, satisfaction) and three whom-value-serves labels (individual, institution, society) were chosen. Whom-value-serves label(s) were assigned to each article within the core matrix. The search years were 1984 to 1995. The articles were analyzed using the Matrix Method(TM). From this matrix template, further in-depth analyses were completed. Of 86 articles on the core matrix, one-fourth were published in medically-related journals. An article could have more than one whom-value-serves label. As a percentage of total whom-value-serves designations the 'institution' labels were prominent. Within the 'individual' labels, patient and pharmacist groups were identified equally. The 'society' label had no strong emphasis. The core matrix articles revealed the pharmacy profession adds value to hospital/retail organizations and the profession. It describes value in terms of cost containment, provision of services, and quality of care. Our intent is to inform health care professionals that our conceptual framework and methodology will be useful.

Suggested Citation

  • Indritz, Mary E. S. & Artz, Margaret B., 1999. "Value added to health by pharmacists," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 647-660, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:48:y:1999:i:5:p:647-660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(98)00362-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:48:y:1999:i:5:p:647-660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.