IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v47y1998i8p1067-1076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A ship upon a stormy sea: The medicalization of pregnancy

Author

Listed:
  • Barker, K. K.

Abstract

This is an empirical illustration of the role of biomedical rhetoric in the rise of medicine's cultural authority. Using the case of pregnancy in the United States I delineate how biomedical rhetoric was key in the historical process of medicalization. The first systematic attempt to introduce women to a medical interpretation of pregnancy was the public health campaign of the United States Children's Bureau in the early twentieth century. A cornerstone of the Children's Bureau campaign was its publication "Prenatal Care," first published in 1913 and distributed to well over twenty-two million women by the mid-thirties. Prenatal Care represents the biomedical interpretation of pregnancy as it was first introduced to women. Through an analysis of this document I demonstrate the discursive mechanisms through which biomedicine reconceptualized pregnancy as medically problematic rather than as experientially and organically demanding. Prenatal Care demonstrates the ways in which the "universal" claims of biomedicine can advance a particular class and racial/ethnic composite of woman.

Suggested Citation

  • Barker, K. K., 1998. "A ship upon a stormy sea: The medicalization of pregnancy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1067-1076, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:47:y:1998:i:8:p:1067-1076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(98)00155-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benoit, Cecilia & Zadoroznyj, Maria & Hallgrimsdottir, Helga & Treloar, Adrienne & Taylor, Kara, 2010. "Medical dominance and neoliberalisation in maternal care provision: The evidence from Canada and Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 475-481, August.
    2. Hammer, Raphaël P. & Burton-Jeangros, Claudine, 2013. "Tensions around risks in pregnancy: A typology of women's experiences of surveillance medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 55-63.
    3. Wagner, Brandon G. & Cleland, Kelly & Batur, Pelin & Wu, Justine & Rothberg, Michael B., 2019. "Emergency contraception: Links between providers' counseling choices, prescribing behaviors, and sociopolitical context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    4. Brown, Eliza, 2020. "Projected diagnosis, anticipatory medicine, and uncertainty: How medical providers ‘rule out’ potential pregnancy in contraceptive counseling," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    5. Vanessa, Grotti & Cynthia, Malakasis & Chiara, Quagliariello & Nina, Sahraoui, 2019. "Temporalities of emergency: Migrant pregnancy and healthcare networks in Southern European borderlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 11-19.
    6. Charles Barthold & Hervé Corvellec, 2018. "« For the women » ‐ In Memoriam Simone Veil (1927–2017)," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(6), pages 593-600, November.
    7. Fordyce, Lauren, 2013. "Accounting for fetal death: Vital statistics and the medicalization of pregnancy in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 124-131.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:47:y:1998:i:8:p:1067-1076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.