Author
Listed:
- Béria, Jorge U.
- Damiani, Magda F.
- dos Santos, Iná S.
- Lombardi, Cintia
Abstract
With the aim of implementing an intervention program on physician's prescribing behaviour for diarrhoea in children under five, an ethnoepidemiological study was conducted in Pelotas (Brazil), from February to April 1993. Information on prescription of drugs was obtained through record review of 381 cases of diarrhoea provided by 33 medical doctors from eight health centres. Trained field workers observed a total of 54 clinical consultations due to diarrhoea. Brief exit interviews with the mothers were performed just after the observations. Twenty-seven open-ended home interviews were made with the mothers the day after they had been observed. After all observations had been completed, open-ended interviews were conducted with 21 physicians. The results showed that there is a misunderstanding of the role of ORS in the treatment of diarrhoea: mothers want something to "cut" diarrhoea and they notice that ORS does not act in this way and doctors do not explain the action of ORS in diarrhoea management. Comparing with record reviews, during observations a child had a lower probability of receiving an antibiotic or antidiarrheal drug prescription. This finding indicates that other variables than technical skills are involved in doctor's prescribing behaviour. A lack of ability or of motivation to deal with "anxious or difficult mothers" led some doctors to enhance antibiotic or other non-recommended drugs to manage diarrhoea. Therefore, efforts to improve the quality of case management of diarrhoea, through intervention programmes in the government health sector, are needed in Pelotas.
Suggested Citation
Béria, Jorge U. & Damiani, Magda F. & dos Santos, Iná S. & Lombardi, Cintia, 1998.
"Physicians' prescribing behaviour for diarrhoea in children: An ethnoepidemiological study in southern Brazil,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 341-346, August.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:47:y:1998:i:3:p:341-346
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:47:y:1998:i:3:p:341-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.